diff options
author | Craig Scott <craig.scott@crascit.com> | 2017-08-05 10:55:49 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Craig Scott <craig.scott@crascit.com> | 2017-08-08 11:17:32 (GMT) |
commit | 11d00a17aafb33385a57a11b53862ac2197f116f (patch) | |
tree | ae47b775193642aceffef4cb522d71b3e4b49134 | |
parent | 7c7a57ce9e14bf2eff1eb1de06e17a8216af1e18 (diff) | |
download | CMake-11d00a17aafb33385a57a11b53862ac2197f116f.zip CMake-11d00a17aafb33385a57a11b53862ac2197f116f.tar.gz CMake-11d00a17aafb33385a57a11b53862ac2197f116f.tar.bz2 |
Help/dev: Add commit message guidelines
-rw-r--r-- | CONTRIBUTING.rst | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Help/dev/review.rst | 48 |
2 files changed, 51 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.rst b/CONTRIBUTING.rst index 3c84c2b..381769d 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.rst +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.rst @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ To contribute patches: #. Base all new work on the upstream ``master`` branch. Base work on the upstream ``release`` branch only if it fixes a regression or bug in a feature new to that release. -#. Create commits making incremental, distinct, logically complete changes. +#. Create commits making incremental, distinct, logically complete changes + with appropriate `commit messages`_. #. Push a topic branch to a personal repository fork on GitLab. #. Create a GitLab Merge Request targeting the upstream ``master`` branch (even if the change is intended for merge to the ``release`` branch). @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ The merge request will enter the `CMake Review Process`_ for consideration. .. _`CMake Repository`: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake .. _`Utilities/SetupForDevelopment.sh`: Utilities/SetupForDevelopment.sh .. _`CMake Source Code Guide`: Help/dev/source.rst +.. _`commit messages`: Help/dev/review.rst#commit-messages .. _`CMake Review Process`: Help/dev/review.rst License diff --git a/Help/dev/review.rst b/Help/dev/review.rst index 9450bf0..985b1b7 100644 --- a/Help/dev/review.rst +++ b/Help/dev/review.rst @@ -185,6 +185,54 @@ commands to ``@kwrobot`` using the form ``Do: ...``: See the corresponding sections for details on permissions and options for each command. +Commit Messages +--------------- + +Part of the human review is to check that each commit message is appropriate. +The first line of the message should begin with one or two words indicating the +area the commit applies to, followed by a colon and then a brief summary. +Committers should aim to keep this first line short. Any subsequent lines +should be separated from the first by a blank line and provide relevant, useful +information. + +The appropriateness of the initial word describing the area the commit applies +to is not something the automatic robot review can judge, so it is up to the +human reviewer to confirm that the area is specified and that it is +appropriate. Good area words include the module name the commit is primarily +fixing, the main C++ source file being edited, ``Help`` for generic +documentation changes or a feature or functionality theme the changes apply to +(e.g. ``server`` or ``Autogen``). Examples of suitable first lines of a commit +message include: + +* ``Help: Fix example in cmake-buildsystem(7) manual`` +* ``FindBoost: Add support for 1.64`` +* ``Autogen: Extended mocInclude tests`` +* ``cmLocalGenerator: Explain standard flag selection logic in comments`` + +If the commit fixes a particular reported issue, this information should +ideally also be part of the commit message. The recommended way to do this is +to place a line at the end of the message in the form ``Fixes: #xxxxx`` where +``xxxxx`` is the GitLab issue number and to separate it from the rest of the +text by a blank line. For example:: + + Help: Fix FooBar example robustness issue + + FooBar supports option X, but the example provided + would not work if Y was also specified. + + Fixes: #12345 + +GitLab will automatically create relevant links to the merge request and will +close the issue when the commit is merged into master. GitLab understands a few +other synonyms for ``Fixes`` and allows much more flexible forms than the +above, but committers should aim for this format for consistency. Note that +such details can alternatively be specified in the merge request description. + +Reviewers are encouraged to ask the committer to amend commit messages to +follow these guidelines, but prefer to focus on the changes themselves as a +first priority. Maintainers will also make a check of commit messages before +merging. + Topic Testing ============= |