diff options
author | Michael Brasser <michael.brasser@nokia.com> | 2010-07-21 02:23:15 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Toby Tomkins <toby.tomkins@nokia.com> | 2010-07-26 07:08:07 (GMT) |
commit | 056bbc32fd64f48851e6ad058c5e4c1372a96564 (patch) | |
tree | a76fc7d01d913e371c949d839d40d3f394960d55 /doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc | |
parent | acebca36dc84677bb0875297b1739e15025323bb (diff) | |
download | Qt-056bbc32fd64f48851e6ad058c5e4c1372a96564.zip Qt-056bbc32fd64f48851e6ad058c5e4c1372a96564.tar.gz Qt-056bbc32fd64f48851e6ad058c5e4c1372a96564.tar.bz2 |
QML focus API updates.
The wantsFocus property has been renamed to activeFocus, to better
reflect its value. Reading and writing the focus property is also now
consistent -- this property represents focus within a scope. Other small
changes were made to keep things consistent with the new naming.
Reviewed-by: Aaron Kennedy
(cherry picked from commit 21806ff0921641b4e4d9d39721ab4ebeae74dddc)
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc b/doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc index cc546c0..661930f 100644 --- a/doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc +++ b/doc/src/declarative/focus.qdoc @@ -73,12 +73,12 @@ See also the \l {Keys}{Keys attached property} and \l {KeyNavigation}{KeyNavigat \section1 Querying the Active Focus Item Whether or not an \l Item has \e {active focus} can be queried through the -property \c {Item::focus}. For example, here we have a \l Text +property \c {Item::activeFocus}. For example, here we have a \l Text element whose text is determined by whether or not it has \e {active focus}. \code Text { - text: focus ? "I have active focus!" : "I do not have active focus" + text: activeFocus ? "I have active focus!" : "I do not have active focus" } \endcode @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Rectangle { The right hand side of the example shows the expanded code - the equivalent QML without the use of the component \c {MyWidget}. From this, the problem is evident - there are no less than three elements that have the \c {Item::focus} -property set to true. Ultimately only one element can have focus, and the +property set to true. Ultimately only one element can have keyboard focus, and the system has to decide which on. In this case the first appearance of the \c {Item::focus} property being set to true on line 4 is selected, and the value of \c {Item::focus} in the other two instances is reverted back to false. This @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ and the others are unset, just like when there are no \e {focus scopes}. \o When a \e {focus scope} receives \e {active focus}, the contained element with \c {Item::focus} set (if any) also gets \e {active focus}. If this element is also a \l FocusScope, the proxying behaviour continues. Both the -\e {focus scope} and the sub-focused item will have \c {Item::focus} set. +\e {focus scope} and the sub-focused item will have \c {Item::activeFocus} set. \endlist So far the example has the second component statically selected. It is trivial |