gcc 4.7.0 compatibility fix for javascript

taken from http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/15071

Change-Id: I701fb5a8d754afe9fcd6b327d779365673e07b5d
Reviewed-by: Alexis Menard <alexis.menard@openbossa.org>
Reviewed-by: Girish Ramakrishnan <girish.1.ramakrishnan@nokia.com>

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSGlobalObject.h b/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSGlobalObject.h
index 7c20272..9eb86e7 100644
--- a/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSGlobalObject.h
+++ b/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSGlobalObject.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ namespace JSC {
     protected:
         using JSVariableObject::JSVariableObjectData;
 
-        struct JSGlobalObjectData : public JSVariableObjectData {
+        struct JSGlobalObjectData : public JSVariableObject::JSVariableObjectData {
             // We use an explicit destructor function pointer instead of a
             // virtual destructor because we want to avoid adding a vtable
             // pointer to this struct. Adding a vtable pointer would force the
diff --git a/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSStaticScopeObject.h b/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSStaticScopeObject.h
index 2542878..3cb66a0 100644
--- a/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSStaticScopeObject.h
+++ b/src/3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/runtime/JSStaticScopeObject.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ namespace JSC{
     class JSStaticScopeObject : public JSVariableObject {
     protected:
         using JSVariableObject::JSVariableObjectData;
-        struct JSStaticScopeObjectData : public JSVariableObjectData {
+        struct JSStaticScopeObjectData : public JSVariableObject::JSVariableObjectData {
             JSStaticScopeObjectData()
                 : JSVariableObjectData(&symbolTable, &registerStore + 1)
             {