diff options
author | Kent Hansen <khansen@trolltech.com> | 2009-09-25 10:32:17 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Kent Hansen <khansen@trolltech.com> | 2009-09-25 10:35:45 (GMT) |
commit | bb62bf61c0577a02003a33bf800025cb85e51b54 (patch) | |
tree | 3591f6ab0a3197051b7c5078a3b241297d56cd4b /tests | |
parent | d0d0fdb8e46351b4ab8492de31e5363ef6662b57 (diff) | |
download | Qt-bb62bf61c0577a02003a33bf800025cb85e51b54.zip Qt-bb62bf61c0577a02003a33bf800025cb85e51b54.tar.gz Qt-bb62bf61c0577a02003a33bf800025cb85e51b54.tar.bz2 |
improve "nested evaluation" test
Test that the variable is stored in the correct activation object.
Currently it's marked as an expected failure because it doesn't work
with the JSC-based back-end. It did however work with the old back-end,
so this is a regression.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/auto/qscriptcontext/tst_qscriptcontext.cpp | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/auto/qscriptcontext/tst_qscriptcontext.cpp b/tests/auto/qscriptcontext/tst_qscriptcontext.cpp index dc7184c..063075d 100644 --- a/tests/auto/qscriptcontext/tst_qscriptcontext.cpp +++ b/tests/auto/qscriptcontext/tst_qscriptcontext.cpp @@ -944,6 +944,16 @@ void tst_QScriptContext::inheritActivationAndThisObject() QVERIFY(ret.isNumber()); QCOMPARE(ret.toInt32(), 123); } + + // QT-2219 + { + eng.globalObject().setProperty("a", 123); + QScriptValue ret = eng.evaluate("(function() { myEval('var a = 456'); return a; })()"); + QVERIFY(ret.isNumber()); + QCOMPARE(ret.toInt32(), 456); + QEXPECT_FAIL("", "QT-2219: Wrong activation object is returned from native function's parent context", Continue); + QVERIFY(eng.globalObject().property("a").strictlyEquals(123)); + } } static QScriptValue parentContextToString(QScriptContext *ctx, QScriptEngine *) |