| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Update license headers again. | Jason McDonald | 2009-09-09 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| | | | | | Reviewed-by: Trust Me | ||||
| * | Update tech preview license header. | Jason McDonald | 2009-08-31 | 1 | -13/+13 |
| | | | | | Reviewed-by: Trust Me | ||||
| * | Update license headers. | Jason McDonald | 2009-08-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | Reviewed-by: Trust Me | ||||
| * | Update license headers as requested by the marketing department. | Jason McDonald | 2009-06-16 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | | | | Reviewed-by: Trust Me | ||||
| * | Add the parameter to the function call. | Thiago Macieira | 2009-03-27 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Apparently we have a problem with these default parameters. We have basically: template<typename T> void func(T * = 0); template<> void func<Something>(Something *); Now, according to GCC, I can't add "= 0" to the template specialisation. However, MSVC 2008 isn't able to call the specialisation without my extra 0 here. I've seen a similar issue before in QSharedPointer. I don't think this is a big deal because the error message output by MSVC 2008 indicates this is likely a compiler bug: qdbuspendingreply.h(98) : error C2440: 'default argument': cannot convert from 'T1 *' to 'QVariant *' where [ T1=QVariant ] | ||||
| * | Long live Qt 4.5! | Lars Knoll | 2009-03-23 | 1 | -0/+213 |
 |
index : Qt.git | |
| Qt s a cross-platform application framework that is used for developing application software that can be run on various software and hardware platforms with little or no change in the underlying codebase, while still being a native application with native capabilities and speed. |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats |