| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Reviewed-by: Trust Me
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
private class member.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Task-number: 250147
Reviewed-by: Thierry
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
it uses les foreach
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Also fix an issue in QTreeView where a signal could be connected
several times
Reviewed-by: Thierry
|
|\ \
| |/
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
tests/auto/qtreeview/tst_qtreeview.cpp
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
the model initially
This was caused by two different bug:
- In the QSortFilterProxyModel, we need to re-sort when setting the
source model change the sorting column (happen when setting a model
initially)
- In the treeview, we need to activate the sorting even if there is no
column yet (because the initial model is empty
Task-number: 254234
Reviewed-by: Thierry
BT:
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In 8cd19116ae81c99fe28fbf91aa7f4c1c08163fe0 we changed viewItems to
always contains the index to the columns 0, even if this columns is
hidden. So this code and comment are now useless.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
QStyleOptionViewItemV4::OnlyOne set
The new autotest tests lots of the flags of the QStyleOption
Reviewed-by: Thierry
Task-number: 252616
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The problem was that we were not always storing the modelindex in
column 0 for each QTreeViewItem. That was causing inconsistencies.
Now it is always the case. It allowed to remove some calls to
QModelIndex::sibling.
Task-number: 239271
Reviewed-by: ogoffart
|
|\ \
| |/
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/gui/graphicsview/qgraphicsitem.cpp
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Discovered in Kopete trunk
BT: yes
Reviewed-by: Thierry
|
|\ \
| |/ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we get an hover event while the model gets invalidated, we might ends
up calling itemDecorationAt before the viewitem is refreshed.
Can be reproduced in KTorrent (Relates to KDE bug 172198) or Kopete trunk
Reviewed-by: Thierry
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now we directly call viewport->update
Task-number: 248850
Reviewed-by: ogoffart
|
|
|