| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/gui/painting/qbackingstore.cpp
src/gui/painting/qwindowsurface_raster.cpp
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We must tell the system that we want to intercept the back key on
Windows mobile. Each toplevel widget that needs correct back key
behaviour needs to have a menu bar. Why? Ask Microsoft...
Task-number: 248846
Reviewed-by: thartman
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When building docs for the mac, qdoc comments for functions defined
in the .h file were not found in any of the .cpp files in the mac
package because they were in the x11 or windows .cpp file. So I
moved them to a .cpp file that is in all the packages.
Task-number: 252496 252492
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When building docs for the mac, qdoc comments for functions defined
in the .h file were not found in any of the .cpp files in the mac
package because they were in the x11 or windows .cpp file. So I
moved them to a .cpp file that is in all the packages.
Task-number: 252496 252492
|
|\ \
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/gui/kernel/qcocoaview_mac_p.h
src/gui/widgets/qmainwindow.cpp
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
embedded somewhere.
If a widget is embedded to non-Qt window on Windows, then we should still clear
the focus whenever we receive WM_KILLFOCUS since we won't get WM_ACTIVATEAPP in
this case. This is an addition to 6ed196051d0f19bfe2d045eaf12f5f5ca30670d0
Task-number: 251259
Reviewed-by: Thierry
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task-number: 246130
Reviewed-by: joerg
Introduce Q_WS_WINCE for Windows CE only windowing parts. So far we
decided to stick with Q_WS_WIN32, but having a separate define
makes the code more readable. In addition Q_WS_WINCE_WM is available
for Windows Mobile only parts, where we do not check for the OS on
runtime.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem was that if you had child widgets of a popup, only child
widgets that had hasMouseTracking() == true received the ToolTip
event. This was because in order for a widget to receive a ToolTip,
it relied on the MouseMove event.
It still relies on the MouseMove event, but the problem with the
previous code was that it did not even *try* to deliver the MouseMove
event to the widget that did not have mousetracking. And it was
the code that "tried" to deliver (QApplication::notify()) the event
that also was responsible of finding which widget it should get the
tooltip from. Unfortunately the previous code did not even enter
QApplication::notify() because of that early cut-off.
The result was that the event was propagated up to the parent widget
(which was the popup) and consumed by the popup. (Nothing would happen
unless the popup itself had a tooltip). This is also how
translateMouseEvent() is implemented in qapplication_x11.cpp.
|
|
|