| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Reviewed-by: Trust Me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we have already a pixmap of an item in the cache, we should
remove the entry from the cache otherwise when we will repaint/modify
the copy of the pixmap (the copy of the cache) then we will trigger a
deep copy ; this is because both entries in the cache and our copy
share the same data and if you modify one of them a copy is triggered.
I have added a benchmark as well to test that.
Reviewed-by:bnilsen
Reviewed-by:andreas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit add a new API to add/find/remove pixmaps into QPixmapCache.
This new extension is based on a key that the cache give you during
the insertion. This key is internally a int which makes all operations
in the cache much more faster that the string approach.
Auto-tests has been extended as well and a benchmark has been added to
compare both approach. I also depecrate the find method for the
string API to have a method pointer based and not reference based like
the Qt policy says.
Reviewed-by: bnilsen
Reviewed-by: andreas
Followed-deeply-by: trond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit add an benchmark to allow testing performance with cache
enable or not. It covers different use cases with item rotating, moving
and so on.
Reviewed-by:bnilsen
|
|
|