| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit add an benchmark to allow testing performance with cache
enable or not. It covers different use cases with item rotating, moving
and so on.
Reviewed-by:bnilsen
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
tests/auto/qpainterpath/tst_qpainterpath.cpp
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Each version of Qt has its own set of autotests, therefore
preprocessor directives relating to obsolete QT_VERSION's
are not necessary.
Reviewed-by: Carlos Duclos
|
| |\ \
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/gui/graphicsview/qgraphicsitem.cpp
src/gui/graphicsview/qgraphicsitem_p.h
src/gui/graphicsview/qgraphicsscene.cpp
src/gui/painting/qtransform.cpp
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
RevBy: bnilsen
AutoTest: Bench
Details : if we come from setPosHelper (so itemChange) we don't need to do all the stuff regarding the size in setGeometry because the size doesn't change.
I remove two calls to fullUpdateHelper and update() because prepareGeometryChange already call updateHelper and setPosHelper call fullUpdaterHelper too so we don't need to call them inside setGeometry.
We can only call prepareGeometryChange only if we don't come from setPos.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
