From 95f7076937065a78029fc50d506fba58f8c6199c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shane Kearns <shane.kearns@sosco.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:51:49 +0100
Subject: Fix qdatetime autotest regression

My previous addition to the test case to validate local time was too
strict for all platforms.

Reviewed-by: Paul
---
 tests/auto/qdatetime/tst_qdatetime.cpp | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/auto/qdatetime/tst_qdatetime.cpp b/tests/auto/qdatetime/tst_qdatetime.cpp
index c53780e..1140402 100644
--- a/tests/auto/qdatetime/tst_qdatetime.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/qdatetime/tst_qdatetime.cpp
@@ -450,11 +450,12 @@ void tst_QDateTime::toString_enumformat()
     qDebug() << str3;
     QVERIFY(!str3.isEmpty());
     //check for date/time components in any order
-    QVERIFY(str3.contains("1995"));
+    //year may be 2 or 4 digits
+    QVERIFY(str3.contains("95"));
     //day and month may be in numeric or word form
     QVERIFY(str3.contains("12"));
     QVERIFY(str3.contains("34"));
-    QVERIFY(str3.contains("56"));
+    //seconds may be absent
 }
 
 void tst_QDateTime::addDays()
-- 
cgit v0.12