diff options
author | Fred Drake <fdrake@acm.org> | 1999-07-02 14:25:37 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Fred Drake <fdrake@acm.org> | 1999-07-02 14:25:37 (GMT) |
commit | 41796918afe5260374671777a33f265f260fa002 (patch) | |
tree | 53523f6b1eb5d06b6e58486c06483ec968788020 | |
parent | 7d807795325127b7b5c21001729ba2a26bd7c451 (diff) | |
download | cpython-41796918afe5260374671777a33f265f260fa002.zip cpython-41796918afe5260374671777a33f265f260fa002.tar.gz cpython-41796918afe5260374671777a33f265f260fa002.tar.bz2 |
Fix a few markup nits, improve some index entries.
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/lib/libpickle.tex | 79 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/lib/libpickle.tex b/Doc/lib/libpickle.tex index c49a05f..f6374d8 100644 --- a/Doc/lib/libpickle.tex +++ b/Doc/lib/libpickle.tex @@ -12,29 +12,30 @@ \indexii{pickling}{objects} -The \module{pickle} module implements a basic but powerful algorithm for -``pickling'' (a.k.a.\ serializing, marshalling or flattening) nearly -arbitrary Python objects. This is the act of converting objects to a -stream of bytes (and back: ``unpickling''). -This is a more primitive notion than -persistency --- although \module{pickle} reads and writes file objects, -it does not handle the issue of naming persistent objects, nor the -(even more complicated) area of concurrent access to persistent -objects. The \module{pickle} module can transform a complex object into -a byte stream and it can transform the byte stream into an object with -the same internal structure. The most obvious thing to do with these -byte streams is to write them onto a file, but it is also conceivable -to send them across a network or store them in a database. The module +The \module{pickle} module implements a basic but powerful algorithm +for ``pickling'' (a.k.a.\ serializing, marshalling or flattening) +nearly arbitrary Python objects. This is the act of converting +objects to a stream of bytes (and back: ``unpickling''). This is a +more primitive notion than persistency --- although \module{pickle} +reads and writes file objects, it does not handle the issue of naming +persistent objects, nor the (even more complicated) area of concurrent +access to persistent objects. The \module{pickle} module can +transform a complex object into a byte stream and it can transform the +byte stream into an object with the same internal structure. The most +obvious thing to do with these byte streams is to write them onto a +file, but it is also conceivable to send them across a network or +store them in a database. The module \refmodule{shelve}\refstmodindex{shelve} provides a simple interface to pickle and unpickle objects on DBM-style database files. \strong{Note:} The \module{pickle} module is rather slow. A reimplementation of the same algorithm in C, which is up to 1000 times -faster, is available as the \refmodule{cPickle}\refbimodindex{cPickle} -module. This has the same interface except that \code{Pickler} and -\code{Unpickler} are factory functions, not classes (so they cannot be -used as base classes for inheritance). +faster, is available as the +\refmodule{cPickle}\refbimodindex{cPickle} module. This has the same +interface except that \class{Pickler} and \class{Unpickler} are +factory functions, not classes (so they cannot be used as base classes +for inheritance). Unlike the built-in module \refmodule{marshal}\refbimodindex{marshal}, \module{pickle} handles the following correctly: @@ -72,12 +73,11 @@ compatibility with the Python 1.4 pickle module. In a future version, the default may change to binary. The \module{pickle} module doesn't handle code objects, which the -\refmodule{marshal} module does. I suppose \module{pickle} could, and maybe -it should, but there's probably no great need for it right now (as -long as \refmodule{marshal} continues to be used for reading and writing -code objects), and at least this avoids the possibility of smuggling -Trojan horses into a program. -\refbimodindex{marshal} +\refmodule{marshal}\refbimodindex{marshal} module does. I suppose +\module{pickle} could, and maybe it should, but there's probably no +great need for it right now (as long as \refmodule{marshal} continues +to be used for reading and writing code objects), and at least this +avoids the possibility of smuggling Trojan horses into a program. For the benefit of persistency modules written using \module{pickle}, it supports the notion of a reference to an object outside the pickled @@ -109,10 +109,15 @@ which should return a \emph{tuple} containing the arguments to be passed to the class constructor (\method{__init__()}). This method is called at pickle time; the tuple it returns is incorporated in the pickle for the instance. -\ttindex{__getinitargs__()} -\ttindex{__init__()} - -Classes can further influence how their instances are pickled --- if the class +\withsubitem{(copy protocol)}{\ttindex{__getinitargs__()}} +\withsubitem{(instance constructor)}{\ttindex{__init__()}} + +Classes can further influence how their instances are pickled --- if +the class +\withsubitem{(copy protocol)}{ + \ttindex{__getstate__()}\ttindex{__setstate__()}} +\withsubitem{(instance attribute)}{ + \ttindex{__dict__}} defines the method \method{__getstate__()}, it is called and the return state is pickled as the contents for the instance, and if the class defines the method \method{__setstate__()}, it is called with the @@ -126,9 +131,6 @@ and \method{__setstate__()}, the state object needn't be a dictionary --- these methods can do what they want.) This protocol is also used by the shallow and deep copying operations defined in the \refmodule{copy}\refstmodindex{copy} module. -\ttindex{__getstate__()} -\ttindex{__setstate__()} -\ttindex{__dict__} Note that when class instances are pickled, their class's code and data are not pickled along with them. Only the instance data are @@ -175,12 +177,12 @@ x = pickle.load(f) \end{verbatim} The \class{Pickler} class only calls the method \code{f.write()} with a +\withsubitem{(class in pickle)}{ + \ttindex{Unpickler}\ttindex{Pickler}} string argument. The \class{Unpickler} calls the methods \code{f.read()} (with an integer argument) and \code{f.readline()} (without argument), both returning a string. It is explicitly allowed to pass non-file objects here, as long as they have the right methods. -\ttindex{Unpickler} -\ttindex{Pickler} The constructor for the \class{Pickler} class has an optional second argument, \var{bin}. If this is present and nonzero, the binary @@ -190,6 +192,7 @@ but backwards compatible) text pickle format is used. The between binary and text pickle formats; it accepts either format. The following types can be pickled: + \begin{itemize} \item \code{None} @@ -257,7 +260,7 @@ the string past the pickled object's representation are ignored. \begin{excdesc}{PicklingError} This exception is raised when an unpicklable object is passed to -\code{Pickler.dump()}. +\method{Pickler.dump()}. \end{excdesc} @@ -283,11 +286,11 @@ This exception is raised when an unpicklable object is passed to The \module{cPickle} module provides a similar interface and identical -functionality as the \refmodule{pickle} module, but can be up to 1000 -times faster since it is implemented in C. The only other -important difference to note is that \function{Pickler()} and -\function{Unpickler()} are functions and not classes, and so cannot be -subclassed. This should not be an issue in most cases. +functionality as the \refmodule{pickle}\refstmodindex{pickle} module, +but can be up to 1000 times faster since it is implemented in C. The +only other important difference to note is that \function{Pickler()} +and \function{Unpickler()} are functions and not classes, and so +cannot be subclassed. This should not be an issue in most cases. The format of the pickle data is identical to that produced using the \refmodule{pickle} module, so it is possible to use \refmodule{pickle} and |