summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeal Norwitz <nnorwitz@gmail.com>2006-08-12 18:44:06 (GMT)
committerNeal Norwitz <nnorwitz@gmail.com>2006-08-12 18:44:06 (GMT)
commit1872b1c01f343f4cbfa7696ce95beae8278ce210 (patch)
tree382d8080c87b1484d3449b9108f65b023ccdaef8
parent8a87f5d37e6aab91ddc4c6491877b6cbd48a12cf (diff)
downloadcpython-1872b1c01f343f4cbfa7696ce95beae8278ce210.zip
cpython-1872b1c01f343f4cbfa7696ce95beae8278ce210.tar.gz
cpython-1872b1c01f343f4cbfa7696ce95beae8278ce210.tar.bz2
Fix a couple of bugs exposed by the new __index__ code. The 64-bit buildbots
were failing due to inappropriate clipping of numbers larger than 2**31 with new-style classes. (typeobject.c) In reviewing the code for classic classes, there were 2 problems. Any negative value return could be returned. Always return -1 if there was an error. Also make the checks similar with the new-style classes. I believe this is correct for 32 and 64 bit boxes, including Windows64. Add a test of classic classes too.
-rw-r--r--Lib/test/test_index.py11
-rw-r--r--Misc/NEWS6
-rw-r--r--Objects/classobject.c13
-rw-r--r--Objects/typeobject.c8
4 files changed, 25 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_index.py b/Lib/test/test_index.py
index b224a50..1081b53 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_index.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_index.py
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ class OverflowTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(self.pos.__index__(), self.pos)
self.assertEqual(self.neg.__index__(), self.neg)
- def test_getitem(self):
- class GetItem(object):
+ def _getitem_helper(self, base):
+ class GetItem(base):
def __len__(self):
return maxint
def __getitem__(self, key):
@@ -195,6 +195,13 @@ class OverflowTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(x[self.neg:self.pos], (-1, maxint))
self.assertEqual(x[self.neg:self.pos:1].indices(maxint), (0, maxint, 1))
+ def test_getitem(self):
+ self._getitem_helper(object)
+
+ def test_getitem_classic(self):
+ class Empty: pass
+ self._getitem_helper(Empty)
+
def test_sequence_repeat(self):
self.failUnlessRaises(OverflowError, lambda: "a" * self.pos)
self.failUnlessRaises(OverflowError, lambda: "a" * self.neg)
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS
index 49de4b6..f81389d 100644
--- a/Misc/NEWS
+++ b/Misc/NEWS
@@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ What's New in Python 2.5 release candidate 1?
Core and builtins
-----------------
+- Fix bug related to __len__ functions using values > 2**32 on 64-bit machines
+ with new-style classes.
+
+- Fix bug related to __len__ functions returning negative values with
+ classic classes.
+
- Patch #1538606, Fix __index__() clipping. There were some problems
discovered with the API and how integers that didn't fit into Py_ssize_t
were handled. This patch attempts to provide enough alternatives
diff --git a/Objects/classobject.c b/Objects/classobject.c
index 1e93908..e8bac91 100644
--- a/Objects/classobject.c
+++ b/Objects/classobject.c
@@ -974,24 +974,25 @@ instance_length(PyInstanceObject *inst)
if (res == NULL)
return -1;
if (PyInt_Check(res)) {
- Py_ssize_t temp = PyInt_AsSsize_t(res);
- if (temp == -1 && PyErr_Occurred()) {
+ outcome = PyInt_AsSsize_t(res);
+ if (outcome == -1 && PyErr_Occurred()) {
Py_DECREF(res);
return -1;
}
- outcome = (Py_ssize_t)temp;
-#if SIZEOF_SIZE_T < SIZEOF_LONG
+#if SIZEOF_SIZE_T < SIZEOF_INT
/* Overflow check -- range of PyInt is more than C int */
- if (outcome != temp) {
+ if (outcome != (int)outcome) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
"__len__() should return 0 <= outcome < 2**31");
outcome = -1;
}
else
#endif
- if (outcome < 0)
+ if (outcome < 0) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
"__len__() should return >= 0");
+ outcome = -1;
+ }
}
else {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError,
diff --git a/Objects/typeobject.c b/Objects/typeobject.c
index 517d4db..6edd455 100644
--- a/Objects/typeobject.c
+++ b/Objects/typeobject.c
@@ -4110,19 +4110,17 @@ slot_sq_length(PyObject *self)
{
static PyObject *len_str;
PyObject *res = call_method(self, "__len__", &len_str, "()");
- Py_ssize_t temp;
Py_ssize_t len;
if (res == NULL)
return -1;
- temp = PyInt_AsSsize_t(res);
- len = (int)temp;
+ len = PyInt_AsSsize_t(res);
Py_DECREF(res);
if (len == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
return -1;
-#if SIZEOF_SIZE_T < SIZEOF_LONG
+#if SIZEOF_SIZE_T < SIZEOF_INT
/* Overflow check -- range of PyInt is more than C ssize_t */
- if (len != temp) {
+ if (len != (int)len) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
"__len__() should return 0 <= outcome < 2**31");
return -1;