diff options
author | Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> | 2003-11-29 23:52:13 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> | 2003-11-29 23:52:13 (GMT) |
commit | 6c9e130524533263b690e86639a36b6f3e7a8eeb (patch) | |
tree | 39023f825688f630245ddcaa60af9942a859522c | |
parent | 37e136373e0d9ab3bdf25ecd9c42b86281ed21d3 (diff) | |
download | cpython-6c9e130524533263b690e86639a36b6f3e7a8eeb.zip cpython-6c9e130524533263b690e86639a36b6f3e7a8eeb.tar.gz cpython-6c9e130524533263b690e86639a36b6f3e7a8eeb.tar.bz2 |
- Removed FutureWarnings related to hex/oct literals and conversions
and left shifts. (Thanks to Kalle Svensson for SF patch 849227.)
This addresses most of the remaining semantic changes promised by
PEP 237, except for repr() of a long, which still shows the trailing
'L'. The PEP appears to promise warnings for operations that
changed semantics compared to Python 2.3, but this is not
implemented; we've suffered through enough warnings related to
hex/oct literals and I think it's best to be silent now.
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/ref/ref2.tex | 24 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_builtin.py | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_compile.py | 19 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_format.py | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_grammar.py | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_hexoct.py | 64 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Misc/NEWS | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Objects/intobject.c | 42 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Objects/stringobject.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Objects/unicodeobject.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Python/compile.c | 14 |
11 files changed, 120 insertions, 148 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/ref/ref2.tex b/Doc/ref/ref2.tex index 76c5cc5..33bf053 100644 --- a/Doc/ref/ref2.tex +++ b/Doc/ref/ref2.tex @@ -580,25 +580,23 @@ allowed as suffix for long integers, it is strongly recommended to always use \character{L}, since the letter \character{l} looks too much like the digit \character{1}. -Plain integer decimal literals that are above the largest representable -plain integer (e.g., 2147483647 when using 32-bit arithmetic) are accepted -as if they were long integers instead. Octal and hexadecimal literals -behave similarly, but when in the range just above the largest representable -plain integer but below the largest unsigned 32-bit number (on a machine -using 32-bit arithmetic), 4294967296, they are taken as the negative plain -integer obtained by subtracting 4294967296 from their unsigned value. There -is no limit for long integer literals apart from what can be stored in -available memory. For example, 0xdeadbeef is taken, on a 32-bit machine, -as the value -559038737, while 0xdeadbeeffeed is taken as the value -244837814107885L. +Plain integer literals that are above the largest representable plain +integer (e.g., 2147483647 when using 32-bit arithmetic) are accepted +as if they were long integers instead.\footnote{In versions of Python +prior to 2.4, octal and hexadecimal literals in the range just above +the largest representable plain integer but below the largest unsigned +32-bit number (on a machine using 32-bit arithmetic), 4294967296, were +taken as the negative plain integer obtained by subtracting 4294967296 +from their unsigned value.} There is no limit for long integer +literals apart from what can be stored in available memory. Some examples of plain integer literals (first row) and long integer literals (second and third rows): \begin{verbatim} -7 2147483647 0177 0x80000000 +7 2147483647 0177 3L 79228162514264337593543950336L 0377L 0x100000000L - 79228162514264337593543950336 0xdeadbeeffeed + 79228162514264337593543950336 0xdeadbeef \end{verbatim} diff --git a/Lib/test/test_builtin.py b/Lib/test/test_builtin.py index d47a9da..1953f29 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_builtin.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_builtin.py @@ -437,8 +437,7 @@ class BuiltinTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_hex(self): self.assertEqual(hex(16), '0x10') self.assertEqual(hex(16L), '0x10L') - self.assertEqual(len(hex(-1)), len(hex(sys.maxint))) - self.assert_(hex(-16) in ('0xfffffff0', '0xfffffffffffffff0')) + self.assertEqual(hex(-16), '-0x10') self.assertEqual(hex(-16L), '-0x10L') self.assertRaises(TypeError, hex, {}) @@ -757,7 +756,7 @@ class BuiltinTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_oct(self): self.assertEqual(oct(100), '0144') self.assertEqual(oct(100L), '0144L') - self.assert_(oct(-100) in ('037777777634', '01777777777777777777634')) + self.assertEqual(oct(-100), '-0144') self.assertEqual(oct(-100L), '-0144L') self.assertRaises(TypeError, oct, ()) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_compile.py b/Lib/test/test_compile.py index 4d4ba4f..e2b1c95 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_compile.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_compile.py @@ -119,15 +119,18 @@ if 1: def test_unary_minus(self): # Verify treatment of unary minus on negative numbers SF bug #660455 - warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", "hex/oct constants", FutureWarning) - warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", "hex.* of negative int", FutureWarning) - # XXX Of course the following test will have to be changed in Python 2.4 - # This test is in a <string> so the filterwarnings() can affect it - all_one_bits = '0xffffffff' - if sys.maxint != 2147483647: + if sys.maxint == 2147483647: + # 32-bit machine + all_one_bits = '0xffffffff' + self.assertEqual(eval(all_one_bits), 4294967295L) + self.assertEqual(eval("-" + all_one_bits), -4294967295L) + elif sys.maxint == 9223372036854775807: + # 64-bit machine all_one_bits = '0xffffffffffffffff' - self.assertEqual(eval(all_one_bits), -1) - self.assertEqual(eval("-" + all_one_bits), 1) + self.assertEqual(eval(all_one_bits), 18446744073709551615L) + self.assertEqual(eval("-" + all_one_bits), -18446744073709551615L) + else: + self.fail("How many bits *does* this machine have???") def test_sequence_unpacking_error(self): # Verify sequence packing/unpacking with "or". SF bug #757818 diff --git a/Lib/test/test_format.py b/Lib/test/test_format.py index f791874..0a51231 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_format.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_format.py @@ -183,12 +183,12 @@ testboth("%#X", 0, "0X0") testboth("%#X", 0L, "0X0") testboth("%x", 0x42, "42") -# testboth("%x", -0x42, "ffffffbe") # specific to 32-bit boxes; see below +testboth("%x", -0x42, "-42") testboth("%x", 0x42L, "42") testboth("%x", -0x42L, "-42") testboth("%o", 042, "42") -# testboth("%o", -042, "37777777736") # specific to 32-bit boxes; see below +testboth("%o", -042, "-42") testboth("%o", 042L, "42") testboth("%o", -042L, "-42") @@ -238,6 +238,3 @@ if sys.maxint == 2**32-1: pass else: raise TestFailed, '"%*d"%(sys.maxint, -127) should fail' - # (different things go wrong on a 64 bit box...) - testboth("%x", -0x42, "ffffffbe") - testboth("%o", -042, "37777777736") diff --git a/Lib/test/test_grammar.py b/Lib/test/test_grammar.py index c57bbed..6666c13 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_grammar.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_grammar.py @@ -39,20 +39,20 @@ except ImportError: if maxint == 2147483647: # The following test will start to fail in Python 2.4; # change the 020000000000 to -020000000000 - if -2147483647-1 != 020000000000: raise TestFailed, 'max negative int' + if -2147483647-1 != -020000000000: raise TestFailed, 'max negative int' # XXX -2147483648 - if 037777777777 != -1: raise TestFailed, 'oct -1' - if 0xffffffff != -1: raise TestFailed, 'hex -1' + if 037777777777 < 0: raise TestFailed, 'large oct' + if 0xffffffff < 0: raise TestFailed, 'large hex' for s in '2147483648', '040000000000', '0x100000000': try: x = eval(s) except OverflowError: print "OverflowError on huge integer literal " + `s` elif eval('maxint == 9223372036854775807'): - if eval('-9223372036854775807-1 != 01000000000000000000000'): + if eval('-9223372036854775807-1 != -01000000000000000000000'): raise TestFailed, 'max negative int' - if eval('01777777777777777777777') != -1: raise TestFailed, 'oct -1' - if eval('0xffffffffffffffff') != -1: raise TestFailed, 'hex -1' + if eval('01777777777777777777777') < 0: raise TestFailed, 'large oct' + if eval('0xffffffffffffffff') < 0: raise TestFailed, 'large hex' for s in '9223372036854775808', '02000000000000000000000', \ '0x10000000000000000': try: diff --git a/Lib/test/test_hexoct.py b/Lib/test/test_hexoct.py index 8a57906..f71dbe0 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_hexoct.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_hexoct.py @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ """Test correct treatment of hex/oct constants. This is complex because of changes due to PEP 237. - -Some of these tests will have to change in Python 2.4! """ import sys @@ -41,31 +39,28 @@ class TextHexOct(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual(-0x7fffffffffffffff, -9223372036854775807) def test_hex_unsigned(self): - # This test is in a <string> so we can ignore the warnings - exec """if 1: if platform_long_is_32_bits: - # Positive-looking constants with negavive values - self.assertEqual(0x80000000, -2147483648L) - self.assertEqual(0xffffffff, -1) + # Positive constants + self.assertEqual(0x80000000, 2147483648L) + self.assertEqual(0xffffffff, 4294967295L) # Ditto with a minus sign and parentheses - self.assertEqual(-(0x80000000), 2147483648L) - self.assertEqual(-(0xffffffff), 1) + self.assertEqual(-(0x80000000), -2147483648L) + self.assertEqual(-(0xffffffff), -4294967295L) # Ditto with a minus sign and NO parentheses # This failed in Python 2.2 through 2.2.2 and in 2.3a1 - self.assertEqual(-0x80000000, 2147483648L) - self.assertEqual(-0xffffffff, 1) + self.assertEqual(-0x80000000, -2147483648L) + self.assertEqual(-0xffffffff, -4294967295L) else: - # Positive-looking constants with negavive values - self.assertEqual(0x8000000000000000, -9223372036854775808L) - self.assertEqual(0xffffffffffffffff, -1) + # Positive constants + self.assertEqual(0x8000000000000000, 9223372036854775808L) + self.assertEqual(0xffffffffffffffff, 18446744073709551615L) # Ditto with a minus sign and parentheses - self.assertEqual(-(0x8000000000000000), 9223372036854775808L) - self.assertEqual(-(0xffffffffffffffff), 1) + self.assertEqual(-(0x8000000000000000), -9223372036854775808L) + self.assertEqual(-(0xffffffffffffffff), -18446744073709551615L) # Ditto with a minus sign and NO parentheses # This failed in Python 2.2 through 2.2.2 and in 2.3a1 - self.assertEqual(-0x8000000000000000, 9223372036854775808L) - self.assertEqual(-0xffffffffffffffff, 1) - \n""" + self.assertEqual(-0x8000000000000000, -9223372036854775808L) + self.assertEqual(-0xffffffffffffffff, -18446744073709551615L) def test_oct_baseline(self): # Baseline tests @@ -91,31 +86,28 @@ class TextHexOct(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual(-0777777777777777777777, -9223372036854775807) def test_oct_unsigned(self): - # This test is in a <string> so we can ignore the warnings - exec """if 1: if platform_long_is_32_bits: - # Positive-looking constants with negavive values - self.assertEqual(020000000000, -2147483648L) - self.assertEqual(037777777777, -1) + # Positive constants + self.assertEqual(020000000000, 2147483648L) + self.assertEqual(037777777777, 4294967295L) # Ditto with a minus sign and parentheses - self.assertEqual(-(020000000000), 2147483648L) - self.assertEqual(-(037777777777), 1) + self.assertEqual(-(020000000000), -2147483648L) + self.assertEqual(-(037777777777), -4294967295L) # Ditto with a minus sign and NO parentheses # This failed in Python 2.2 through 2.2.2 and in 2.3a1 - self.assertEqual(-020000000000, 2147483648L) - self.assertEqual(-037777777777, 1) + self.assertEqual(-020000000000, -2147483648L) + self.assertEqual(-037777777777, -4294967295L) else: - # Positive-looking constants with negavive values - self.assertEqual(01000000000000000000000, -9223372036854775808L) - self.assertEqual(01777777777777777777777, -1) + # Positive constants + self.assertEqual(01000000000000000000000, 9223372036854775808L) + self.assertEqual(01777777777777777777777, 18446744073709551615L) # Ditto with a minus sign and parentheses - self.assertEqual(-(01000000000000000000000), 9223372036854775808L) - self.assertEqual(-(01777777777777777777777), 1) + self.assertEqual(-(01000000000000000000000), -9223372036854775808L) + self.assertEqual(-(01777777777777777777777), -18446744073709551615L) # Ditto with a minus sign and NO parentheses # This failed in Python 2.2 through 2.2.2 and in 2.3a1 - self.assertEqual(-01000000000000000000000, 9223372036854775808L) - self.assertEqual(-01777777777777777777777, 1) - \n""" + self.assertEqual(-01000000000000000000000, -9223372036854775808L) + self.assertEqual(-01777777777777777777777, -18446744073709551615L) def test_main(): test_support.run_unittest(TextHexOct) @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@ What's New in Python 2.4 alpha 1? Core and builtins ----------------- +- Removed FutureWarnings related to hex/oct literals and conversions + and left shifts. (Thanks to Kalle Svensson for SF patch 849227.) + This addresses most of the remaining semantic changes promised by + PEP 237, except for repr() of a long, which still shows the trailing + 'L'. The PEP appears to promise warnings for operations that + changed semantics compared to Python 2.3, but this is not + implemented; we've suffered through enough warnings related to + hex/oct literals and I think it's best to be silent now. + - For str and unicode objects, the ljust(), center(), and rjust() methods now accept an optional argument specifying a fill character other than a space. diff --git a/Objects/intobject.c b/Objects/intobject.c index b97e2bc..47acbff 100644 --- a/Objects/intobject.c +++ b/Objects/intobject.c @@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ PyInt_FromString(char *s, char **pend, int base) char *end; long x; char buffer[256]; /* For errors */ - int warn = 0; if ((base != 0 && base < 2) || base > 36) { PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, @@ -292,7 +291,7 @@ PyInt_FromString(char *s, char **pend, int base) if (base == 0 && s[0] == '0') { x = (long) PyOS_strtoul(s, &end, base); if (x < 0) - warn = 1; + return PyLong_FromString(s, pend, base); } else x = PyOS_strtol(s, &end, base); @@ -312,11 +311,6 @@ PyInt_FromString(char *s, char **pend, int base) return NULL; return PyLong_FromString(s, pend, base); } - if (warn) { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "int('0...', 0): sign will change in Python 2.4") < 0) - return NULL; - } if (pend) *pend = end; return PyInt_FromLong(x); @@ -766,18 +760,13 @@ int_lshift(PyIntObject *v, PyIntObject *w) if (a == 0 || b == 0) return int_pos(v); if (b >= LONG_BIT) { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "x<<y losing bits or changing sign " - "will return a long in Python 2.4 and up") < 0) - return NULL; - return PyInt_FromLong(0L); + return PyNumber_Lshift(PyLong_FromLong(PyInt_AS_LONG(v)), + PyLong_FromLong(PyInt_AS_LONG(w))); } c = a << b; if (a != Py_ARITHMETIC_RIGHT_SHIFT(long, c, b)) { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "x<<y losing bits or changing sign " - "will return a long in Python 2.4 and up") < 0) - return NULL; + return PyNumber_Lshift(PyLong_FromLong(PyInt_AS_LONG(v)), + PyLong_FromLong(PyInt_AS_LONG(w))); } return PyInt_FromLong(c); } @@ -868,13 +857,9 @@ int_oct(PyIntObject *v) { char buf[100]; long x = v -> ob_ival; - if (x < 0) { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "hex()/oct() of negative int will return " - "a signed string in Python 2.4 and up") < 0) - return NULL; - } - if (x == 0) + if (x < 0) + PyOS_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "-0%lo", -x); + else if (x == 0) strcpy(buf, "0"); else PyOS_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "0%lo", x); @@ -886,13 +871,10 @@ int_hex(PyIntObject *v) { char buf[100]; long x = v -> ob_ival; - if (x < 0) { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "hex()/oct() of negative int will return " - "a signed string in Python 2.4 and up") < 0) - return NULL; - } - PyOS_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "0x%lx", x); + if (x < 0) + PyOS_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "-0x%lx", -x); + else + PyOS_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "0x%lx", x); return PyString_FromString(buf); } diff --git a/Objects/stringobject.c b/Objects/stringobject.c index 739cc3e..d3351df 100644 --- a/Objects/stringobject.c +++ b/Objects/stringobject.c @@ -3565,6 +3565,7 @@ formatint(char *buf, size_t buflen, int flags, worst case length = 3 + 19 (worst len of INT_MAX on 64-bit machine) + 1 + 1 = 24 */ char fmt[64]; /* plenty big enough! */ + char *sign; long x; x = PyInt_AsLong(v); @@ -3572,12 +3573,13 @@ formatint(char *buf, size_t buflen, int flags, PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "int argument required"); return -1; } - if (x < 0 && type != 'd' && type != 'i') { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "%u/%o/%x/%X of negative int will return " - "a signed string in Python 2.4 and up") < 0) - return -1; + if (x < 0 && type == 'u') { + type = 'd'; } + if (x < 0 && (type == 'x' || type == 'X' || type == 'o')) + sign = "-"; + else + sign = ""; if (prec < 0) prec = 1; @@ -3603,24 +3605,27 @@ formatint(char *buf, size_t buflen, int flags, * Note that this is the same approach as used in * formatint() in unicodeobject.c */ - PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "0%c%%.%dl%c", - type, prec, type); + PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "%s0%c%%.%dl%c", + sign, type, prec, type); } else { - PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "%%%s.%dl%c", - (flags&F_ALT) ? "#" : "", + PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "%s%%%s.%dl%c", + sign, (flags&F_ALT) ? "#" : "", prec, type); } - /* buf = '+'/'-'/'0'/'0x' + '[0-9]'*max(prec, len(x in octal)) - * worst case buf = '0x' + [0-9]*prec, where prec >= 11 + /* buf = '+'/'-'/'' + '0'/'0x'/'' + '[0-9]'*max(prec, len(x in octal)) + * worst case buf = '-0x' + [0-9]*prec, where prec >= 11 */ - if (buflen <= 13 || buflen <= (size_t)2 + (size_t)prec) { + if (buflen <= 14 || buflen <= (size_t)3 + (size_t)prec) { PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "formatted integer is too long (precision too large?)"); return -1; } - PyOS_snprintf(buf, buflen, fmt, x); + if (sign[0]) + PyOS_snprintf(buf, buflen, fmt, -x); + else + PyOS_snprintf(buf, buflen, fmt, x); return strlen(buf); } @@ -3907,8 +3912,6 @@ PyString_Format(PyObject *format, PyObject *args) prec, c, &pbuf, &len); if (!temp) goto error; - /* unbounded ints can always produce - a sign character! */ sign = 1; } else { @@ -3918,8 +3921,7 @@ PyString_Format(PyObject *format, PyObject *args) flags, prec, c, v); if (len < 0) goto error; - /* only d conversion is signed */ - sign = c == 'd'; + sign = 1; } if (flags & F_ZERO) fill = '0'; diff --git a/Objects/unicodeobject.c b/Objects/unicodeobject.c index c950f8b..f87d749 100644 --- a/Objects/unicodeobject.c +++ b/Objects/unicodeobject.c @@ -6177,24 +6177,26 @@ formatint(Py_UNICODE *buf, * = 24 */ char fmt[64]; /* plenty big enough! */ + char *sign; long x; x = PyInt_AsLong(v); if (x == -1 && PyErr_Occurred()) return -1; - if (x < 0 && type != 'd' && type != 'i') { - if (PyErr_Warn(PyExc_FutureWarning, - "%u/%o/%x/%X of negative int will return " - "a signed string in Python 2.4 and up") < 0) - return -1; + if (x < 0 && type == 'u') { + type = 'd'; } + if (x < 0 && (type == 'x' || type == 'X' || type == 'o')) + sign = "-"; + else + sign = ""; if (prec < 0) prec = 1; - /* buf = '+'/'-'/'0'/'0x' + '[0-9]'*max(prec,len(x in octal)) - * worst case buf = '0x' + [0-9]*prec, where prec >= 11 + /* buf = '+'/'-'/'' + '0'/'0x'/'' + '[0-9]'*max(prec, len(x in octal)) + * worst case buf = '-0x' + [0-9]*prec, where prec >= 11 */ - if (buflen <= 13 || buflen <= (size_t)2 + (size_t)prec) { + if (buflen <= 14 || buflen <= (size_t)3 + (size_t)prec) { PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "formatted integer is too long (precision too large?)"); return -1; @@ -6222,15 +6224,18 @@ formatint(Py_UNICODE *buf, * Note that this is the same approach as used in * formatint() in stringobject.c */ - PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "0%c%%.%dl%c", - type, prec, type); + PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "%s0%c%%.%dl%c", + sign, type, prec, type); } else { - PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "%%%s.%dl%c", - (flags&F_ALT) ? "#" : "", + PyOS_snprintf(fmt, sizeof(fmt), "%s%%%s.%dl%c", + sign, (flags&F_ALT) ? "#" : "", prec, type); } - return usprintf(buf, fmt, x); + if (sign[0]) + return usprintf(buf, fmt, -x); + else + return usprintf(buf, fmt, x); } static int @@ -6566,8 +6571,6 @@ PyObject *PyUnicode_Format(PyObject *format, goto onError; pbuf = PyUnicode_AS_UNICODE(temp); len = PyUnicode_GET_SIZE(temp); - /* unbounded ints can always produce - a sign character! */ sign = 1; } else { @@ -6576,8 +6579,7 @@ PyObject *PyUnicode_Format(PyObject *format, flags, prec, c, v); if (len < 0) goto onError; - /* only d conversion is signed */ - sign = c == 'd'; + sign = 1; } if (flags & F_ZERO) fill = '0'; diff --git a/Python/compile.c b/Python/compile.c index 4fb47ae..04d8b65 100644 --- a/Python/compile.c +++ b/Python/compile.c @@ -1258,19 +1258,7 @@ parsenumber(struct compiling *c, char *s) if (s[0] == '0') { x = (long) PyOS_strtoul(s, &end, 0); if (x < 0 && errno == 0) { - if (PyErr_WarnExplicit( - PyExc_FutureWarning, - "hex/oct constants > sys.maxint " - "will return positive values " - "in Python 2.4 and up", - /* XXX: Give WarnExplicit - a const char* argument. */ - (char*)c->c_filename, - c->c_lineno, - NULL, - NULL) < 0) - return NULL; - errno = 0; /* Might be changed by PyErr_Warn() */ + return PyLong_FromString(s, (char **)0, 0); } } else |