summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuido van Rossum <guido@python.org>2000-01-20 21:37:19 (GMT)
committerGuido van Rossum <guido@python.org>2000-01-20 21:37:19 (GMT)
commite0a928dc1ec74f487471d102ae6efacc92055aa6 (patch)
tree6e5c82168a10435f158170ccc70d29f4d282ea57
parent72ca1b353676e814725377dc892cc9ad30a31292 (diff)
downloadcpython-e0a928dc1ec74f487471d102ae6efacc92055aa6.zip
cpython-e0a928dc1ec74f487471d102ae6efacc92055aa6.tar.gz
cpython-e0a928dc1ec74f487471d102ae6efacc92055aa6.tar.bz2
Fix some broken links.
-rw-r--r--Demo/metaclasses/index.html6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Demo/metaclasses/index.html b/Demo/metaclasses/index.html
index 1a54cdd..af9caa9 100644
--- a/Demo/metaclasses/index.html
+++ b/Demo/metaclasses/index.html
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ allowing the Python class syntax to be used to define other class-like
entities. Don Beaudry has used this in his infamous <A
HREF="http://maigret.cog.brown.edu/pyutil/">MESS</A> package; Jim
Fulton has used it in his <A
-HREF="http://www.digicool.com/papers/ExtensionClass.html">Extension
+HREF="http://www.digicool.com/releases/ExtensionClass/">Extension
Classes</A> package. (It has also been referred to as the ``Don
Beaudry <i>hack</i>,'' but that's a misnomer. There's nothing hackish
about it -- in fact, it is rather elegant and deep, even though
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ type of the base class is callable.''
<P>(Types are not classes, by the way. See questions 4.2, 4.19 and in
particular 6.22 in the <A
-HREF="http://grail.cnri.reston.va.us/cgi-bin/faqw.py" >Python FAQ</A>
+HREF="http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw.py" >Python FAQ</A>
for more on this topic.)
<P>
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ C = B.__class__('C', (B,), {'a': 1, 'b': 2})
This is exactly the same as before except that instead of type(B),
B.__class__ is invoked. If you have read <A HREF=
-"http://grail.cnri.reston.va.us/cgi-bin/faqw.py?req=show&file=faq06.022.htp"
+"http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw.py?req=show&file=faq06.022.htp"
>FAQ question 6.22</A> you will understand that while there is a big
technical difference between type(B) and B.__class__, they play the
same role at different abstraction levels. And perhaps at some point