diff options
author | Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> | 2014-07-06 17:53:27 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> | 2014-07-06 17:53:27 (GMT) |
commit | 898eb826962a6d14e92f2f8c4343abeb3f810030 (patch) | |
tree | ba25badc189d057e3a05fc0ecfb7cc87f7fb6f21 /Doc/faq | |
parent | 63b21a8ffafcf40bb19a2d1be5c9fcdd487363a7 (diff) | |
download | cpython-898eb826962a6d14e92f2f8c4343abeb3f810030.zip cpython-898eb826962a6d14e92f2f8c4343abeb3f810030.tar.gz cpython-898eb826962a6d14e92f2f8c4343abeb3f810030.tar.bz2 |
#20135: move FAQ about mutable default arguments to the programming FAQs page.
Diffstat (limited to 'Doc/faq')
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/faq/design.rst | 56 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/faq/programming.rst | 56 |
2 files changed, 56 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/faq/design.rst b/Doc/faq/design.rst index 49e0c6d..d7be299 100644 --- a/Doc/faq/design.rst +++ b/Doc/faq/design.rst @@ -664,62 +664,6 @@ before you write any of the actual code. Of course Python allows you to be sloppy and not write test cases at all. -Why are default values shared between objects? ----------------------------------------------- - -This type of bug commonly bites neophyte programmers. Consider this function:: - - def foo(mydict={}): # Danger: shared reference to one dict for all calls - ... compute something ... - mydict[key] = value - return mydict - -The first time you call this function, ``mydict`` contains a single item. The -second time, ``mydict`` contains two items because when ``foo()`` begins -executing, ``mydict`` starts out with an item already in it. - -It is often expected that a function call creates new objects for default -values. This is not what happens. Default values are created exactly once, when -the function is defined. If that object is changed, like the dictionary in this -example, subsequent calls to the function will refer to this changed object. - -By definition, immutable objects such as numbers, strings, tuples, and ``None``, -are safe from change. Changes to mutable objects such as dictionaries, lists, -and class instances can lead to confusion. - -Because of this feature, it is good programming practice to not use mutable -objects as default values. Instead, use ``None`` as the default value and -inside the function, check if the parameter is ``None`` and create a new -list/dictionary/whatever if it is. For example, don't write:: - - def foo(mydict={}): - ... - -but:: - - def foo(mydict=None): - if mydict is None: - mydict = {} # create a new dict for local namespace - -This feature can be useful. When you have a function that's time-consuming to -compute, a common technique is to cache the parameters and the resulting value -of each call to the function, and return the cached value if the same value is -requested again. This is called "memoizing", and can be implemented like this:: - - # Callers will never provide a third parameter for this function. - def expensive(arg1, arg2, _cache={}): - if (arg1, arg2) in _cache: - return _cache[(arg1, arg2)] - - # Calculate the value - result = ... expensive computation ... - _cache[(arg1, arg2)] = result # Store result in the cache - return result - -You could use a global variable containing a dictionary instead of the default -value; it's a matter of taste. - - Why is there no goto? --------------------- diff --git a/Doc/faq/programming.rst b/Doc/faq/programming.rst index 8dcaa3a..71194d0 100644 --- a/Doc/faq/programming.rst +++ b/Doc/faq/programming.rst @@ -352,6 +352,62 @@ the import inside the class but outside of any method still causes the import to occur when the module is initialized. +Why are default values shared between objects? +---------------------------------------------- + +This type of bug commonly bites neophyte programmers. Consider this function:: + + def foo(mydict={}): # Danger: shared reference to one dict for all calls + ... compute something ... + mydict[key] = value + return mydict + +The first time you call this function, ``mydict`` contains a single item. The +second time, ``mydict`` contains two items because when ``foo()`` begins +executing, ``mydict`` starts out with an item already in it. + +It is often expected that a function call creates new objects for default +values. This is not what happens. Default values are created exactly once, when +the function is defined. If that object is changed, like the dictionary in this +example, subsequent calls to the function will refer to this changed object. + +By definition, immutable objects such as numbers, strings, tuples, and ``None``, +are safe from change. Changes to mutable objects such as dictionaries, lists, +and class instances can lead to confusion. + +Because of this feature, it is good programming practice to not use mutable +objects as default values. Instead, use ``None`` as the default value and +inside the function, check if the parameter is ``None`` and create a new +list/dictionary/whatever if it is. For example, don't write:: + + def foo(mydict={}): + ... + +but:: + + def foo(mydict=None): + if mydict is None: + mydict = {} # create a new dict for local namespace + +This feature can be useful. When you have a function that's time-consuming to +compute, a common technique is to cache the parameters and the resulting value +of each call to the function, and return the cached value if the same value is +requested again. This is called "memoizing", and can be implemented like this:: + + # Callers will never provide a third parameter for this function. + def expensive(arg1, arg2, _cache={}): + if (arg1, arg2) in _cache: + return _cache[(arg1, arg2)] + + # Calculate the value + result = ... expensive computation ... + _cache[(arg1, arg2)] = result # Store result in the cache + return result + +You could use a global variable containing a dictionary instead of the default +value; it's a matter of taste. + + How can I pass optional or keyword parameters from one function to another? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |