diff options
author | Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> | 2009-01-03 21:18:54 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> | 2009-01-03 21:18:54 (GMT) |
commit | 48310cd3f2e02ced9ae836ccbcb67e9af3097d62 (patch) | |
tree | 04c86b387c11bfd4835a320e76bbb2ee24626e0d /Doc/howto/functional.rst | |
parent | 3d3558a4653fcfcbdcbb75bda5d61e93c48f4d51 (diff) | |
download | cpython-48310cd3f2e02ced9ae836ccbcb67e9af3097d62.zip cpython-48310cd3f2e02ced9ae836ccbcb67e9af3097d62.tar.gz cpython-48310cd3f2e02ced9ae836ccbcb67e9af3097d62.tar.bz2 |
Remove trailing whitespace.
Diffstat (limited to 'Doc/howto/functional.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/howto/functional.rst | 52 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/howto/functional.rst b/Doc/howto/functional.rst index 1d9b42d..cfa831e 100644 --- a/Doc/howto/functional.rst +++ b/Doc/howto/functional.rst @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ than a large function that performs a complicated transformation. Small functions are also easier to read and to check for errors. -Ease of debugging and testing +Ease of debugging and testing ----------------------------- Testing and debugging a functional-style program is easier. @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ You can experiment with the iteration interface manually: Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? StopIteration - >>> + >>> Python expects iterable objects in several different contexts, the most important being the ``for`` statement. In the statement ``for X in Y``, Y must @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ Generator expressions are surrounded by parentheses ("()") and list comprehensions are surrounded by square brackets ("[]"). Generator expressions have the form:: - ( expression for expr in sequence1 + ( expression for expr in sequence1 if condition1 for expr2 in sequence2 if condition2 @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ equivalent to the following Python code:: if not (conditionN): continue # Skip this element - # Output the value of + # Output the value of # the expression. This means that when there are multiple ``for...in`` clauses but no ``if`` @@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ list is 9 elements long: >>> seq1 = 'abc' >>> seq2 = (1,2,3) >>> [(x,y) for x in seq1 for y in seq2] - [('a', 1), ('a', 2), ('a', 3), - ('b', 1), ('b', 2), ('b', 3), + [('a', 1), ('a', 2), ('a', 3), + ('b', 1), ('b', 2), ('b', 3), ('c', 1), ('c', 2), ('c', 3)] To avoid introducing an ambiguity into Python's grammar, if ``expression`` is @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ Let's look in more detail at built-in functions often used with iterators. Two of Python's built-in functions, :func:`map` and :func:`filter` duplicate the features of generator expressions: -``map(f, iterA, iterB, ...)`` returns an iterator over the sequence +``map(f, iterA, iterB, ...)`` returns an iterator over the sequence ``f(iterA[0], iterB[0]), f(iterA[1], iterB[1]), f(iterA[2], iterB[2]), ...``. >>> def upper(s): @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ features of generator expressions: >>> [upper(s) for s in ['sentence', 'fragment']] ['SENTENCE', 'FRAGMENT'] -You can of course achieve the same effect with a list comprehension. +You can of course achieve the same effect with a list comprehension. ``filter(predicate, iter)`` returns an iterator over all the sequence elements that meet a certain condition, and is similarly duplicated by list @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ values: True >>> all([0,1,0]) False - >>> all([0,0,0]) + >>> all([0,0,0]) False >>> all([1,1,1]) True @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ operators. Some examples are ``operator.add(a, b)`` (adds two values), ``itertools.starmap(func, iter)`` assumes that the iterable will return a stream of tuples, and calls ``f()`` using these tuples as the arguments:: - itertools.starmap(os.path.join, + itertools.starmap(os.path.join, [('/usr', 'bin', 'java'), ('/bin', 'python'), ('/usr', 'bin', 'perl'),('/usr', 'bin', 'ruby')]) => @@ -887,9 +887,9 @@ value and an iterator for the elements with that key. :: - city_list = [('Decatur', 'AL'), ('Huntsville', 'AL'), ('Selma', 'AL'), + city_list = [('Decatur', 'AL'), ('Huntsville', 'AL'), ('Selma', 'AL'), ('Anchorage', 'AK'), ('Nome', 'AK'), - ('Flagstaff', 'AZ'), ('Phoenix', 'AZ'), ('Tucson', 'AZ'), + ('Flagstaff', 'AZ'), ('Phoenix', 'AZ'), ('Tucson', 'AZ'), ... ] @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ value and an iterator for the elements with that key. where iterator-1 => ('Decatur', 'AL'), ('Huntsville', 'AL'), ('Selma', 'AL') - iterator-2 => + iterator-2 => ('Anchorage', 'AK'), ('Nome', 'AK') iterator-3 => ('Flagstaff', 'AZ'), ('Phoenix', 'AZ'), ('Tucson', 'AZ') @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ is equivalent to :: >>> double(add(5, 6)) 22 - + The ``unpack`` keyword is provided to work around the fact that Python functions are not always `fully curried <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currying>`__. By default, it is expected that the ``inner`` function will return a single object @@ -1054,15 +1054,15 @@ and that the ``outer`` function will take a single argument. Setting the will be expanded before being passed to ``outer``. Put simply, :: compose(f, g)(5, 6) - + is equivalent to:: f(g(5, 6)) - + while :: compose(f, g, unpack=True)(5, 6) - + is equivalent to:: f(*g(5, 6)) @@ -1074,21 +1074,21 @@ provided by both ``functional`` and ``functools``). :: from functional import compose, partial import functools - + multi_compose = partial(functools.reduce, compose) - - + + We can also use ``map()``, ``compose()`` and ``partial()`` to craft a version of ``"".join(...)`` that converts its arguments to string:: from functional import compose, partial - + join = compose("".join, partial(map, str)) ``flip(func)`` - + ``flip()`` wraps the callable in ``func`` and causes it to receive its non-keyword arguments in reverse order. :: @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ non-keyword arguments in reverse order. :: (7, 6, 5) ``foldl(func, start, iterable)`` - + ``foldl()`` takes a binary function, a starting value (usually some kind of 'zero'), and an iterable. The function is applied to the starting value and the first element of the list, then the result of that and the second element of the @@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ is equivalent to:: f(f(f(0, 1), 2), 3) - + ``foldl()`` is roughly equivalent to the following recursive function:: def foldl(func, start, seq): @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ Fredrik Lundh once suggested the following set of rules for refactoring uses of 4) Convert the lambda to a def statement, using that name. 5) Remove the comment. -I really like these rules, but you're free to disagree +I really like these rules, but you're free to disagree about whether this lambda-free style is better. @@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ for text processing, in the section titled "Utilizing Higher-Order Functions in Text Processing". Mertz also wrote a 3-part series of articles on functional programming -for IBM's DeveloperWorks site; see +for IBM's DeveloperWorks site; see `part 1 <http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-prog.html>`__, `part 2 <http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-prog2.html>`__, and `part 3 <http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-prog3.html>`__, |