Bug #489256: remove note about Python 1.1 profiler

1 files changed, 41 insertions, 41 deletions

diff --git a/Doc/lib/libprofile.tex b/Doc/lib/libprofile.tex
index e7632a1..ddbae73 100644
--- a/Doc/lib/libprofile.tex
+++ b/Doc/lib/libprofile.tex
@@ -55,47 +55,47 @@ examine the results of a profile operation.
 \index{profiling, deterministic}
 
 
-\section{How Is This Profiler Different From The Old Profiler?}
-\nodename{Profiler Changes}
-
-(This section is of historical importance only; the old profiler
-discussed here was last seen in Python 1.1.)
-
-The big changes from old profiling module are that you get more
-information, and you pay less CPU time.  It's not a trade-off, it's a
-trade-up.
-
-To be specific:
-
-\begin{description}
-
-\item[Bugs removed:]
-Local stack frame is no longer molested, execution time is now charged
-to correct functions.
-
-\item[Accuracy increased:]
-Profiler execution time is no longer charged to user's code,
-calibration for platform is supported, file reads are not done \emph{by}
-profiler \emph{during} profiling (and charged to user's code!).
-
-\item[Speed increased:]
-Overhead CPU cost was reduced by more than a factor of two (perhaps a
-factor of five), lightweight profiler module is all that must be
-loaded, and the report generating module (\module{pstats}) is not needed
-during profiling.
-
-\item[Recursive functions support:]
-Cumulative times in recursive functions are correctly calculated;
-recursive entries are counted.
-
-\item[Large growth in report generating UI:]
-Distinct profiles runs can be added together forming a comprehensive
-report; functions that import statistics take arbitrary lists of
-files; sorting criteria is now based on keywords (instead of 4 integer
-options); reports shows what functions were profiled as well as what
-profile file was referenced; output format has been improved.
-
-\end{description}
+%\section{How Is This Profiler Different From The Old Profiler?}
+%\nodename{Profiler Changes}
+%
+%(This section is of historical importance only; the old profiler
+%discussed here was last seen in Python 1.1.)
+%
+%The big changes from old profiling module are that you get more
+%information, and you pay less CPU time.  It's not a trade-off, it's a
+%trade-up.
+%
+%To be specific:
+%
+%\begin{description}
+%
+%\item[Bugs removed:]
+%Local stack frame is no longer molested, execution time is now charged
+%to correct functions.
+%
+%\item[Accuracy increased:]
+%Profiler execution time is no longer charged to user's code,
+%calibration for platform is supported, file reads are not done \emph{by}
+%profiler \emph{during} profiling (and charged to user's code!).
+%
+%\item[Speed increased:]
+%Overhead CPU cost was reduced by more than a factor of two (perhaps a
+%factor of five), lightweight profiler module is all that must be
+%loaded, and the report generating module (\module{pstats}) is not needed
+%during profiling.
+%
+%\item[Recursive functions support:]
+%Cumulative times in recursive functions are correctly calculated;
+%recursive entries are counted.
+%
+%\item[Large growth in report generating UI:]
+%Distinct profiles runs can be added together forming a comprehensive
+%report; functions that import statistics take arbitrary lists of
+%files; sorting criteria is now based on keywords (instead of 4 integer
+%options); reports shows what functions were profiled as well as what
+%profile file was referenced; output format has been improved.
+%
+%\end{description}
 
 
 \section{Instant Users Manual \label{profile-instant}}