Issue #24314: Fix doc links for general attributes like __name__, __dict__

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/Doc/library/inspect.rst b/Doc/library/inspect.rst
index b28d0f9..8e7ed19 100644
--- a/Doc/library/inspect.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/inspect.rst
@@ -374,8 +374,9 @@ attributes:
    are true.
 
    This, for example, is true of ``int.__add__``.  An object passing this test
-   has a :attr:`__get__` attribute but not a :attr:`__set__` attribute, but
-   beyond that the set of attributes varies.  :attr:`__name__` is usually
+   has a :meth:`~object.__get__` method but not a :meth:`~object.__set__`
+   method, but beyond that the set of attributes varies.  A
+   :attr:`~definition.__name__` attribute is usually
    sensible, and :attr:`__doc__` often is.
 
    Methods implemented via descriptors that also pass one of the other tests
@@ -388,11 +389,11 @@ attributes:
 
    Return true if the object is a data descriptor.
 
-   Data descriptors have both a :attr:`__get__` and a :attr:`__set__` attribute.
+   Data descriptors have both a :attr:`~object.__get__` and a :attr:`~object.__set__` method.
    Examples are properties (defined in Python), getsets, and members.  The
    latter two are defined in C and there are more specific tests available for
    those types, which is robust across Python implementations.  Typically, data
-   descriptors will also have :attr:`__name__` and :attr:`__doc__` attributes
+   descriptors will also have :attr:`~definition.__name__` and :attr:`__doc__` attributes
    (properties, getsets, and members have both of these attributes), but this is
    not guaranteed.