[3.13] gh-116666: Add "token" glossary term (GH-130888) (GH-131367)

gh-116666: Add "token" glossary term (GH-130888)

Add glossary entry for `token`, and link to it.
Avoid talking about tokens in the SyntaxError intro (errors.rst); at this point
tokenization is too much of a technical detail. (Even to an advanced reader,
the fact that a *single* token is highlighted isn't too relevant. Also, we don't
need to guarantee that it's a single token.)
(cherry picked from commit 30d52058493e07fd1d3efea960482f4001bd2f86)

Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/Doc/tutorial/interactive.rst b/Doc/tutorial/interactive.rst
index 4e054c4..00e705f 100644
--- a/Doc/tutorial/interactive.rst
+++ b/Doc/tutorial/interactive.rst
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ Alternatives to the Interactive Interpreter
 
 This facility is an enormous step forward compared to earlier versions of the
 interpreter; however, some wishes are left: It would be nice if the proper
-indentation were suggested on continuation lines (the parser knows if an indent
-token is required next).  The completion mechanism might use the interpreter's
-symbol table.  A command to check (or even suggest) matching parentheses,
-quotes, etc., would also be useful.
+indentation were suggested on continuation lines (the parser knows if an
+:data:`~token.INDENT` token is required next).  The completion mechanism might
+use the interpreter's symbol table.  A command to check (or even suggest)
+matching parentheses, quotes, etc., would also be useful.
 
 One alternative enhanced interactive interpreter that has been around for quite
 some time is IPython_, which features tab completion, object exploration and