diff options
author | Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> | 2011-04-03 13:20:21 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> | 2011-04-03 13:20:21 (GMT) |
commit | b5ff3e4ce5f16ac9af5c682c6e8156393745f329 (patch) | |
tree | fa347e3d2f4f997bc44a4586754678be84465200 /Doc | |
parent | d05595697d70bef1c5cf66484e1d1102d510152e (diff) | |
download | cpython-b5ff3e4ce5f16ac9af5c682c6e8156393745f329.zip cpython-b5ff3e4ce5f16ac9af5c682c6e8156393745f329.tar.gz cpython-b5ff3e4ce5f16ac9af5c682c6e8156393745f329.tar.bz2 |
Fix typo noticed by Sandro Tosi.
Diffstat (limited to 'Doc')
-rw-r--r-- | Doc/library/profile.rst | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/library/profile.rst b/Doc/library/profile.rst index c5e5dd5..82cc2eb 100644 --- a/Doc/library/profile.rst +++ b/Doc/library/profile.rst @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ compatibility layer on top of the internal :mod:`_lsprof` module. The profiler modules are designed to provide an execution profile for a given program, not for benchmarking purposes (for that, there is :mod:`timeit` for - resonably accurate results). This particularly applies to benchmarking + reasonably accurate results). This particularly applies to benchmarking Python code against C code: the profilers introduce overhead for Python code, but not for C-level functions, and so the C code would seem faster than any Python one. |