Fix most trivially-findable print statements.

There's one major and one minor category still unfixed:
doctests are the major category (and I hope to be able to augment the
refactoring tool to refactor bona fide doctests soon);
other code generating print statements in strings is the minor category.

(Oh, and I don't know if the compiler package works.)

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/Lib/Cookie.py b/Lib/Cookie.py
index 46ef3ea..fb06840 100644
--- a/Lib/Cookie.py
+++ b/Lib/Cookie.py
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ attributes by using the .output() function
    >>> C = Cookie.SmartCookie()
    >>> C["rocky"] = "road"
    >>> C["rocky"]["path"] = "/cookie"
-   >>> print C.output(header="Cookie:")
+   >>> print(C.output(header="Cookie:"))
    Cookie: rocky=road; Path=/cookie
-   >>> print C.output(attrs=[], header="Cookie:")
+   >>> print(C.output(attrs=[], header="Cookie:"))
    Cookie: rocky=road
 
 The load() method of a Cookie extracts cookies from a string.  In a
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ such trickeries do not confuse it.
 
    >>> C = Cookie.SmartCookie()
    >>> C.load('keebler="E=everybody; L=\\"Loves\\"; fudge=\\012;";')
-   >>> print C
+   >>> print(C)
    Set-Cookie: keebler="E=everybody; L=\"Loves\"; fudge=\012;"
 
 Each element of the Cookie also supports all of the RFC 2109
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ attribute.
    >>> C = Cookie.SmartCookie()
    >>> C["oreo"] = "doublestuff"
    >>> C["oreo"]["path"] = "/"
-   >>> print C
+   >>> print(C)
    Set-Cookie: oreo=doublestuff; Path=/
 
 Each dictionary element has a 'value' attribute, which gives you
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ it is still possible to use Cookie.Cookie() to create a Cookie.  In
 fact, this simply returns a SmartCookie.
 
    >>> C = Cookie.Cookie()
-   >>> print C.__class__.__name__
+   >>> print(C.__class__.__name__)
    SmartCookie