diff options
author | Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> | 2002-08-03 09:56:52 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> | 2002-08-03 09:56:52 (GMT) |
commit | 657fe38241a7f072bdbf040a7bd05df96f326c5c (patch) | |
tree | 1cea4e21c0bb515702af1cd180ff350cfc1b9ebf /Lib/heapq.py | |
parent | 6bdbc9e0b1d17e637236dc71b3fa775c23dd1d40 (diff) | |
download | cpython-657fe38241a7f072bdbf040a7bd05df96f326c5c.zip cpython-657fe38241a7f072bdbf040a7bd05df96f326c5c.tar.gz cpython-657fe38241a7f072bdbf040a7bd05df96f326c5c.tar.bz2 |
Large code rearrangement to use better algorithms, in the sense of needing
substantially fewer array-element compares. This is best practice as of
Kntuh Volume 3 Ed 2, and the code is actually simpler this way (although
the key idea may be counter-intuitive at first glance! breaking out of
a loop early loses when it costs more to try to get out early than getting
out early saves).
Also added a comment block explaining the difference and giving some real
counts; demonstrating that heapify() is more efficient than repeated
heappush(); and emphasizing the obvious point thatlist.sort() is more
efficient if what you really want to do is sort.
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib/heapq.py')
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/heapq.py | 118 |
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/heapq.py b/Lib/heapq.py index dfda498..278ba24 100644 --- a/Lib/heapq.py +++ b/Lib/heapq.py @@ -126,43 +126,8 @@ From all times, sorting has always been a Great Art! :-) def heappush(heap, item): """Push item onto heap, maintaining the heap invariant.""" - pos = len(heap) - heap.append(None) - while pos: - parentpos = (pos - 1) >> 1 - parent = heap[parentpos] - if item >= parent: - break - heap[pos] = parent - pos = parentpos - heap[pos] = item - -# The child indices of heap index pos are already heaps, and we want to make -# a heap at index pos too. -def _siftdown(heap, pos): - endpos = len(heap) - assert pos < endpos - item = heap[pos] - # Sift item into position, down from pos, moving the smaller - # child up, until finding pos such that item <= pos's children. - childpos = 2*pos + 1 # leftmost child position - while childpos < endpos: - # Set childpos and child to reflect smaller child. - child = heap[childpos] - rightpos = childpos + 1 - if rightpos < endpos: - rightchild = heap[rightpos] - if rightchild < child: - childpos = rightpos - child = rightchild - # If item is no larger than smaller child, we're done, else - # move the smaller child up. - if item <= child: - break - heap[pos] = child - pos = childpos - childpos = 2*pos + 1 - heap[pos] = item + heap.append(item) + _siftdown(heap, 0, len(heap)-1) def heappop(heap): """Pop the smallest item off the heap, maintaining the heap invariant.""" @@ -170,7 +135,7 @@ def heappop(heap): if heap: returnitem = heap[0] heap[0] = lastelt - _siftdown(heap, 0) + _siftup(heap, 0) else: returnitem = lastelt return returnitem @@ -184,7 +149,82 @@ def heapify(x): # j-1 is the largest, which is n//2 - 1. If n is odd = 2*j+1, this is # (2*j+1-1)/2 = j so j-1 is the largest, and that's again n//2-1. for i in xrange(n//2 - 1, -1, -1): - _siftdown(x, i) + _siftup(x, i) + +# 'heap' is a heap at all indices >= startpos, except possibly for pos. pos +# is the index of a leaf with a possibly out-of-order value. Restore the +# heap invariant. +def _siftdown(heap, startpos, pos): + newitem = heap[pos] + # Follow the path to the root, moving parents down until finding a place + # newitem fits. + while pos > startpos: + parentpos = (pos - 1) >> 1 + parent = heap[parentpos] + if parent <= newitem: + break + heap[pos] = parent + pos = parentpos + heap[pos] = newitem + +# The child indices of heap index pos are already heaps, and we want to make +# a heap at index pos too. We do this by bubbling the smaller child of +# pos up (and so on with that child's children, etc) until hitting a leaf, +# then using _siftdown to move the oddball originally at index pos into place. +# +# We *could* break out of the loop as soon as we find a pos where newitem <= +# both its children, but turns out that's not a good idea, and despite that +# many books write the algorithm that way. During a heap pop, the last array +# element is sifted in, and that tends to be large, so that comparing it +# against values starting from the root usually doesn't pay (= usually doesn't +# get us out of the loop early). See Knuth, Volume 3, where this is +# explained and quantified in an exercise. +# +# Cutting the # of comparisons is important, since these routines have no +# way to extract "the priority" from an array element, so that intelligence +# is likely to be hiding in custom __cmp__ methods, or in array elements +# storing (priority, record) tuples. Comparisons are thus potentially +# expensive. +# +# On random arrays of length 1000, making this change cut the number of +# comparisons made by heapify() a little, and those made by exhaustive +# heappop() a lot, in accord with theory. Here are typical results from 3 +# runs (3 just to demonstrate how small the variance is): +# +# Compares needed by heapify Compares needed by 1000 heapppops +# -------------------------- --------------------------------- +# 1837 cut to 1663 14996 cut to 8680 +# 1855 cut to 1659 14966 cut to 8678 +# 1847 cut to 1660 15024 cut to 8703 +# +# Building the heap by using heappush() 1000 times instead required +# 2198, 2148, and 2219 compares: heapify() is more efficient, when +# you can use it. +# +# The total compares needed by list.sort() on the same lists were 8627, +# 8627, and 8632 (this should be compared to the sum of heapify() and +# heappop() compares): list.sort() is (unsurprisingly!) more efficent +# for sorting. + +def _siftup(heap, pos): + endpos = len(heap) + startpos = pos + newitem = heap[pos] + # Bubble up the smaller child until hitting a leaf. + childpos = 2*pos + 1 # leftmost child position + while childpos < endpos: + # Set childpos to index of smaller child. + rightpos = childpos + 1 + if rightpos < endpos and heap[rightpos] < heap[childpos]: + childpos = rightpos + # Move the smaller child up. + heap[pos] = heap[childpos] + pos = childpos + childpos = 2*pos + 1 + # The leaf at pos is empty now. Put newitem there, and and bubble it up + # to its final resting place (by sifting its parents down). + heap[pos] = newitem + _siftdown(heap, startpos, pos) if __name__ == "__main__": # Simple sanity test |