diff options
author | Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org> | 2006-02-27 00:24:13 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org> | 2006-02-27 00:24:13 (GMT) |
commit | dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e (patch) | |
tree | d2b7aa53793110100965906b1266296d08bd4ec1 /Lib/test/test_grammar.py | |
parent | d3a5f53a27be821cfdff869fd8ad93a060497e8c (diff) | |
download | cpython-dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e.zip cpython-dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e.tar.gz cpython-dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e.tar.bz2 |
PEP 308 implementation, including minor refdocs and some testcases. It
breaks the parser module, because it adds the if/else construct as well as
two new grammar rules for backward compatibility. If no one else fixes
parsermodule, I guess I'll go ahead and fix it later this week.
The TeX code was checked with texcheck.py, but not rendered. There is
actually a slight incompatibility:
>>> (x for x in lambda:0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
changes into
>>> (x for x in lambda: 0)
File "<stdin>", line 1
(x for x in lambda: 0)
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Since there's no way the former version can be useful, it's probably a
bugfix ;)
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib/test/test_grammar.py')
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_grammar.py | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_grammar.py b/Lib/test/test_grammar.py index aa76b44..0d2d925 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_grammar.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_grammar.py @@ -798,3 +798,28 @@ verify(len(list(g)) == 10) x = 10; t = False; g = ((i,j) for i in range(x) if t for j in range(x)) x = 5; t = True; verify([(i,j) for i in range(10) for j in range(5)] == list(g)) + +# Test ifelse expressions in various cases +def _checkeval(msg, ret): + "helper to check that evaluation of expressions is done correctly" + print x + return ret + +verify([ x() for x in lambda: True, lambda: False if x() ] == [True]) +verify([ x() for x in (lambda: True, lambda: False) if x() ] == [True]) +verify([ x(False) for x in (lambda x: False if x else True, lambda x: True if x else False) if x(False) ] == [True]) +verify((5 if 1 else _checkeval("check 1", 0)) == 5) +verify((_checkeval("check 2", 0) if 0 else 5) == 5) +verify((5 and 6 if 0 else 1) == 1) +verify(((5 and 6) if 0 else 1) == 1) +verify((5 and (6 if 1 else 1)) == 6) +verify((0 or _checkeval("check 3", 2) if 0 else 3) == 3) +verify((1 or _checkeval("check 4", 2) if 1 else _checkeval("check 5", 3)) == 1) +verify((0 or 5 if 1 else _checkeval("check 6", 3)) == 5) +verify((not 5 if 1 else 1) == False) +verify((not 5 if 0 else 1) == 1) +verify((6 + 1 if 1 else 2) == 7) +verify((6 - 1 if 1 else 2) == 5) +verify((6 * 2 if 1 else 4) == 12) +verify((6 / 2 if 1 else 3) == 3) +verify((6 < 4 if 0 else 2) == 2) |