Merge p3yk branch with the trunk up to revision 45595. This breaks a fair

number of tests, all because of the codecs/_multibytecodecs issue described
here (it's not a Py3K issue, just something Py3K discovers):
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064051.html

Hye-Shik Chang promised to look for a fix, so no need to fix it here. The
tests that are expected to break are:

test_codecencodings_cn
test_codecencodings_hk
test_codecencodings_jp
test_codecencodings_kr
test_codecencodings_tw
test_codecs
test_multibytecodec

This merge fixes an actual test failure (test_weakref) in this branch,
though, so I believe merging is the right thing to do anyway.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 113 deletions

diff --git a/Lib/test/test_regex.py b/Lib/test/test_regex.py
deleted file mode 100644
index 2e2c8f65..0000000
--- a/Lib/test/test_regex.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
-from test.test_support import verbose, sortdict
-import warnings
-warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", "the regex module is deprecated",
-                        DeprecationWarning, __name__)
-import regex
-from regex_syntax import *
-
-re = 'a+b+c+'
-print 'no match:', regex.match(re, 'hello aaaabcccc world')
-print 'successful search:', regex.search(re, 'hello aaaabcccc world')
-try:
-    cre = regex.compile('\(' + re)
-except regex.error:
-    print 'caught expected exception'
-else:
-    print 'expected regex.error not raised'
-
-print 'failed awk syntax:', regex.search('(a+)|(b+)', 'cdb')
-prev = regex.set_syntax(RE_SYNTAX_AWK)
-print 'successful awk syntax:', regex.search('(a+)|(b+)', 'cdb')
-regex.set_syntax(prev)
-print 'failed awk syntax:', regex.search('(a+)|(b+)', 'cdb')
-
-re = '\(<one>[0-9]+\) *\(<two>[0-9]+\)'
-print 'matching with group names and compile()'
-cre = regex.compile(re)
-print cre.match('801 999')
-try:
-    print cre.group('one')
-except regex.error:
-    print 'caught expected exception'
-else:
-    print 'expected regex.error not raised'
-
-print 'matching with group names and symcomp()'
-cre = regex.symcomp(re)
-print cre.match('801 999')
-print cre.group(0)
-print cre.group('one')
-print cre.group(1, 2)
-print cre.group('one', 'two')
-print 'realpat:', cre.realpat
-print 'groupindex:', sortdict(cre.groupindex)
-
-re = 'world'
-cre = regex.compile(re)
-print 'not case folded search:', cre.search('HELLO WORLD')
-cre = regex.compile(re, regex.casefold)
-print 'case folded search:', cre.search('HELLO WORLD')
-
-print '__members__:', cre.__members__
-print 'regs:', cre.regs
-print 'last:', cre.last
-print 'translate:', len(cre.translate)
-print 'givenpat:', cre.givenpat
-
-print 'match with pos:', cre.match('hello world', 7)
-print 'search with pos:', cre.search('hello world there world', 7)
-print 'bogus group:', cre.group(0, 1, 3)
-try:
-    print 'no name:', cre.group('one')
-except regex.error:
-    print 'caught expected exception'
-else:
-    print 'expected regex.error not raised'
-
-from regex_tests import *
-if verbose: print 'Running regex_tests test suite'
-
-for t in tests:
-    pattern=s=outcome=repl=expected=None
-    if len(t)==5:
-        pattern, s, outcome, repl, expected = t
-    elif len(t)==3:
-        pattern, s, outcome = t
-    else:
-        raise ValueError, ('Test tuples should have 3 or 5 fields',t)
-
-    try:
-        obj=regex.compile(pattern)
-    except regex.error:
-        if outcome==SYNTAX_ERROR: pass    # Expected a syntax error
-        else:
-            # Regex syntax errors aren't yet reported, so for
-            # the official test suite they'll be quietly ignored.
-            pass
-            #print '=== Syntax error:', t
-    else:
-        try:
-            result=obj.search(s)
-        except regex.error, msg:
-            print '=== Unexpected exception', t, repr(msg)
-        if outcome==SYNTAX_ERROR:
-            # This should have been a syntax error; forget it.
-            pass
-        elif outcome==FAIL:
-            if result==-1: pass   # No match, as expected
-            else: print '=== Succeeded incorrectly', t
-        elif outcome==SUCCEED:
-            if result!=-1:
-                # Matched, as expected, so now we compute the
-                # result string and compare it to our expected result.
-                start, end = obj.regs[0]
-                found=s[start:end]
-                groups=obj.group(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
-                vardict=vars()
-                for i in range(len(groups)):
-                    vardict['g'+str(i+1)]=str(groups[i])
-                repl=eval(repl)
-                if repl!=expected:
-                    print '=== grouping error', t, repr(repl)+' should be '+repr(expected)
-            else:
-                print '=== Failed incorrectly', t