diff options
author | Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> | 2001-05-13 00:19:31 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> | 2001-05-13 00:19:31 (GMT) |
commit | 2f228e75e4d5ac8c3eb4a6334dbc43243bff1095 (patch) | |
tree | ce1923e23fad608ef3d5749ed5a0e59f08530182 /Lib/test/test_unicode.py | |
parent | 0194ad5c7d2a0ffe473b87933768cb509417ff59 (diff) | |
download | cpython-2f228e75e4d5ac8c3eb4a6334dbc43243bff1095.zip cpython-2f228e75e4d5ac8c3eb4a6334dbc43243bff1095.tar.gz cpython-2f228e75e4d5ac8c3eb4a6334dbc43243bff1095.tar.bz2 |
Get rid of the superstitious "~" in dict hashing's "i = (~hash) & mask".
The comment following used to say:
/* We use ~hash instead of hash, as degenerate hash functions, such
as for ints <sigh>, can have lots of leading zeros. It's not
really a performance risk, but better safe than sorry.
12-Dec-00 tim: so ~hash produces lots of leading ones instead --
what's the gain? */
That is, there was never a good reason for doing it. And to the contrary,
as explained on Python-Dev last December, it tended to make the *sum*
(i + incr) & mask (which is the first table index examined in case of
collison) the same "too often" across distinct hashes.
Changing to the simpler "i = hash & mask" reduced the number of string-dict
collisions (== # number of times we go around the lookup for-loop) from about
6 million to 5 million during a full run of the test suite (these are
approximate because the test suite does some random stuff from run to run).
The number of collisions in non-string dicts also decreased, but not as
dramatically.
Note that this may, for a given dict, change the order (wrt previous
releases) of entries exposed by .keys(), .values() and .items(). A number
of std tests suffered bogus failures as a result. For dicts keyed by
small ints, or (less so) by characters, the order is much more likely to be
in increasing order of key now; e.g.,
>>> d = {}
>>> for i in range(10):
... d[i] = i
...
>>> d
{0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9}
>>>
Unfortunately. people may latch on to that in small examples and draw a
bogus conclusion.
test_support.py
Moved test_extcall's sortdict() into test_support, made it stronger,
and imported sortdict into other std tests that needed it.
test_unicode.py
Excluced cp875 from the "roundtrip over range(128)" test, because
cp875 doesn't have a well-defined inverse for unicode("?", "cp875").
See Python-Dev for excruciating details.
Cookie.py
Chaged various output functions to sort dicts before building
strings from them.
test_extcall
Fiddled the expected-result file. This remains sensitive to native
dict ordering, because, e.g., if there are multiple errors in a
keyword-arg dict (and test_extcall sets up many cases like that), the
specific error Python complains about first depends on native dict
ordering.
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib/test/test_unicode.py')
-rw-r--r-- | Lib/test/test_unicode.py | 7 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_unicode.py b/Lib/test/test_unicode.py index 0df8217..c82ac69 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_unicode.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_unicode.py @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Written by Marc-Andre Lemburg (mal@lemburg.com). (c) Copyright CNRI, All Rights Reserved. NO WARRANTY. """#" -from test_support import verify, verbose +from test_support import verify, verbose, TestFailed import sys def test(method, input, output, *args): @@ -493,11 +493,14 @@ for encoding in ( 'cp856', 'cp857', 'cp864', 'cp869', 'cp874', 'mac_greek', 'mac_iceland','mac_roman', 'mac_turkish', - 'cp1006', 'cp875', 'iso8859_8', + 'cp1006', 'iso8859_8', ### These have undefined mappings: #'cp424', + ### These fail the round-trip: + #'cp875' + ): try: verify(unicode(s,encoding).encode(encoding) == s) |