Merged revisions 70578,70599,70641-70642,70650,70660-70661,70674,70691,70697-70698,70700,70704 via svnmerge from

svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk

........
  r70578 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-23 22:24:56 -0500 (Mon, 23 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  this is better written using assertRaises
........
  r70599 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-25 16:42:51 -0500 (Wed, 25 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  this can be slightly less ugly
........
  r70641 | guilherme.polo | 2009-03-27 16:43:08 -0500 (Fri, 27 Mar 2009) | 3 lines

  Adjusted _tkinter to compile without warnings when WITH_THREAD is not
  defined (part of issue #5035)
........
  r70642 | georg.brandl | 2009-03-27 19:48:48 -0500 (Fri, 27 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  Fix typo.
........
  r70650 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-28 14:16:10 -0500 (Sat, 28 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  give os.symlink and os.link() better parameter names #5564
........
  r70660 | georg.brandl | 2009-03-28 14:52:58 -0500 (Sat, 28 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  Switch to fixed Sphinx version.
........
  r70661 | georg.brandl | 2009-03-28 14:57:36 -0500 (Sat, 28 Mar 2009) | 2 lines

  Add section numbering to some of the larger subdocuments.
........
  r70674 | guilherme.polo | 2009-03-29 05:19:05 -0500 (Sun, 29 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  Typo fix.
........
  r70691 | raymond.hettinger | 2009-03-29 13:51:11 -0500 (Sun, 29 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  Make life easier for non-CPython implementations.
........
  r70697 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-29 16:22:35 -0500 (Sun, 29 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  this has been fixed since 2.6 (I love removing these)
........
  r70698 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-29 16:31:05 -0500 (Sun, 29 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  thanks to guido's bytecode verifier, this is fixed
........
  r70700 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-29 16:50:14 -0500 (Sun, 29 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  use the awesome new status iterator
........
  r70704 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-03-29 21:49:32 -0500 (Sun, 29 Mar 2009) | 1 line

  there's actually three methods here #5600
........

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 61 deletions

diff --git a/Lib/test/crashers/bogus_sre_bytecode.py b/Lib/test/crashers/bogus_sre_bytecode.py
deleted file mode 100644
index 7f006d9..0000000
--- a/Lib/test/crashers/bogus_sre_bytecode.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-"""
-The regular expression engine in '_sre' can segfault when interpreting
-bogus bytecode.
-
-It is unclear whether this is a real bug or a "won't fix" case like
-bogus_code_obj.py, because it requires bytecode that is built by hand,
-as opposed to compiled by 're' from a string-source regexp.  The
-difference with bogus_code_obj, though, is that the only existing regexp
-compiler is written in Python, so that the C code has no choice but
-accept arbitrary bytecode from Python-level.
-
-The test below builds and runs random bytecodes until 'match' crashes
-Python.  I have not investigated why exactly segfaults occur nor how
-hard they would be to fix.  Here are a few examples of 'code' that
-segfault for me:
-
-    [21, 50814, 8, 29, 16]
-    [21, 3967, 26, 10, 23, 54113]
-    [29, 23, 0, 2, 5]
-    [31, 64351, 0, 28, 3, 22281, 20, 4463, 9, 25, 59154, 15245, 2,
-                  16343, 3, 11600, 24380, 10, 37556, 10, 31, 15, 31]
-
-Here is also a 'code' that triggers an infinite uninterruptible loop:
-
-    [29, 1, 8, 21, 1, 43083, 6]
-
-"""
-
-import _sre, random
-
-def pick():
-    n = random.randrange(-65536, 65536)
-    if n < 0:
-        n &= 31
-    return n
-
-ss = ["", "world", "x" * 500]
-
-while 1:
-    code = [pick() for i in range(random.randrange(5, 25))]
-    print(code)
-    pat = _sre.compile(None, 0, code)
-    for s in ss:
-        try:
-            pat.match(s)
-        except RuntimeError:
-            pass
diff --git a/Lib/test/crashers/multithreaded_close.py b/Lib/test/crashers/multithreaded_close.py
deleted file mode 100644
index f862d28..0000000
--- a/Lib/test/crashers/multithreaded_close.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
-# f.close() is not thread-safe: calling it at the same time as another
-# operation (or another close) on the same file, but done from another
-# thread, causes crashes.  The issue is more complicated than it seems,
-# witness the discussions in:
-#
-# http://bugs.python.org/issue595601
-# http://bugs.python.org/issue815646
-
-import _thread
-
-while 1:
-    f = open("multithreaded_close.tmp", "w")
-    _thread.start_new_thread(f.close, ())
-    f.close()