Merged revisions 73232 via svnmerge from

svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk

........
  r73232 | georg.brandl | 2009-06-04 20:59:58 +0200 (Do, 04 Jun 2009) | 1 line

  Add test for #3684.
........

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Lib/test/test_traceback.py b/Lib/test/test_traceback.py
index 64dc748..9033238 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_traceback.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_traceback.py
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ class SyntaxTracebackCases(unittest.TestCase):
     def syntax_error_with_caret(self):
         compile("def fact(x):\n\treturn x!\n", "?", "exec")
 
+    def syntax_error_with_caret_2(self):
+        compile("1 +\n", "?", "exec")
+
     def syntax_error_without_caret(self):
         # XXX why doesn't compile raise the same traceback?
         import test.badsyntax_nocaret
@@ -41,6 +44,12 @@ class SyntaxTracebackCases(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assert_("^" in err[2]) # third line has caret
         self.assertEqual(err[1].find("!"), err[2].find("^")) # in the right place
 
+        err = self.get_exception_format(self.syntax_error_with_caret_2,
+                                        SyntaxError)
+        self.assert_("^" in err[2]) # third line has caret
+        self.assert_(err[2].count('\n') == 1) # and no additional newline
+        self.assert_(err[1].find("+") == err[2].find("^")) # in the right place
+
     def test_nocaret(self):
         if is_jython:
             # jython adds a caret in this case (why shouldn't it?)