summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorromasku <romasku135@gmail.com>2020-05-15 20:12:05 (GMT)
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2020-05-15 20:12:05 (GMT)
commit382a5635bd10c237c3e23e346b21cde27e48d7fa (patch)
treeaeafbddb7b6a726cb148345269719c79043354d7 /Lib
parentc087a268a4d4ead8ef2ca21e325423818729da89 (diff)
downloadcpython-382a5635bd10c237c3e23e346b21cde27e48d7fa.zip
cpython-382a5635bd10c237c3e23e346b21cde27e48d7fa.tar.gz
cpython-382a5635bd10c237c3e23e346b21cde27e48d7fa.tar.bz2
bpo-40607: Reraise exception during task cancelation in asyncio.wait_for() (GH-20054)
Currently, if asyncio.wait_for() timeout expires, it cancels inner future and then always raises TimeoutError. In case those future is task, it can handle cancelation mannually, and those process can lead to some other exception. Current implementation silently loses thoses exception. To resolve this, wait_for will check was the cancelation successfull or not. In case there was exception, wait_for will reraise it. Co-authored-by: Roman Skurikhin <roman.skurikhin@cruxlab.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib')
-rw-r--r--Lib/asyncio/tasks.py10
-rw-r--r--Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_tasks.py55
2 files changed, 60 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/asyncio/tasks.py b/Lib/asyncio/tasks.py
index 717837d..f5de1a2 100644
--- a/Lib/asyncio/tasks.py
+++ b/Lib/asyncio/tasks.py
@@ -496,7 +496,15 @@ async def wait_for(fut, timeout, *, loop=None):
# after wait_for() returns.
# See https://bugs.python.org/issue32751
await _cancel_and_wait(fut, loop=loop)
- raise exceptions.TimeoutError()
+ # In case task cancellation failed with some
+ # exception, we should re-raise it
+ # See https://bugs.python.org/issue40607
+ try:
+ fut.result()
+ except exceptions.CancelledError as exc:
+ raise exceptions.TimeoutError() from exc
+ else:
+ raise exceptions.TimeoutError()
finally:
timeout_handle.cancel()
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_tasks.py b/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_tasks.py
index 6eb6b46..0f8d921 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_tasks.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_tasks.py
@@ -80,6 +80,12 @@ class CoroLikeObject:
return self
+# The following value can be used as a very small timeout:
+# it passes check "timeout > 0", but has almost
+# no effect on the test performance
+_EPSILON = 0.0001
+
+
class BaseTaskTests:
Task = None
@@ -904,12 +910,53 @@ class BaseTaskTests:
inner_task = self.new_task(loop, inner())
- with self.assertRaises(asyncio.TimeoutError):
- await asyncio.wait_for(inner_task, timeout=0.1)
+ await asyncio.wait_for(inner_task, timeout=_EPSILON)
- self.assertTrue(task_done)
+ with self.assertRaises(asyncio.TimeoutError) as cm:
+ loop.run_until_complete(foo())
- loop.run_until_complete(foo())
+ self.assertTrue(task_done)
+ chained = cm.exception.__context__
+ self.assertEqual(type(chained), asyncio.CancelledError)
+
+ def test_wait_for_reraises_exception_during_cancellation(self):
+ loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
+ self.addCleanup(loop.close)
+
+ class FooException(Exception):
+ pass
+
+ async def foo():
+ async def inner():
+ try:
+ await asyncio.sleep(0.2)
+ finally:
+ raise FooException
+
+ inner_task = self.new_task(loop, inner())
+
+ await asyncio.wait_for(inner_task, timeout=_EPSILON)
+
+ with self.assertRaises(FooException):
+ loop.run_until_complete(foo())
+
+ def test_wait_for_raises_timeout_error_if_returned_during_cancellation(self):
+ loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
+ self.addCleanup(loop.close)
+
+ async def foo():
+ async def inner():
+ try:
+ await asyncio.sleep(0.2)
+ except asyncio.CancelledError:
+ return 42
+
+ inner_task = self.new_task(loop, inner())
+
+ await asyncio.wait_for(inner_task, timeout=_EPSILON)
+
+ with self.assertRaises(asyncio.TimeoutError):
+ loop.run_until_complete(foo())
def test_wait_for_self_cancellation(self):
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()