diff options
author | Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz@gmail.com> | 2004-06-06 19:58:40 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz@gmail.com> | 2004-06-06 19:58:40 (GMT) |
commit | c3cd9df95ad93b4af010e04396d6e4eca1fffcdf (patch) | |
tree | b01719a20e44744f419b73ed0a252f9117084c87 /Misc/README.valgrind | |
parent | b5d7702e5c8904be43c068825f5e2a5c35082e86 (diff) | |
download | cpython-c3cd9df95ad93b4af010e04396d6e4eca1fffcdf.zip cpython-c3cd9df95ad93b4af010e04396d6e4eca1fffcdf.tar.gz cpython-c3cd9df95ad93b4af010e04396d6e4eca1fffcdf.tar.bz2 |
Add some doc about using valgrind
Diffstat (limited to 'Misc/README.valgrind')
-rw-r--r-- | Misc/README.valgrind | 71 |
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Misc/README.valgrind b/Misc/README.valgrind new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b5751ac --- /dev/null +++ b/Misc/README.valgrind @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +This document describes some caveats about the use of Valgrind with +Python. Valgrind is used periodically by Python developers to try +to ensure there are no memory leaks or invalid memory reads/writes. + +If you don't want to read about the details of using Valgrind, there +are still two things you must do to suppress the warnings. First, +you must use a suppressions file. One is supplied in +Misc/valgrind-python.supp. Second, you must do one of the following: + + * Uncomment Py_USING_MEMORY_DEBUGGER in Objects/obmalloc.c, + then rebuild Python + * Uncomment the lines in Misc/valgrind-python.supp that + suppress the warnings for PyObject_Free and PyObject_Realloc + +Details: +-------- +Python uses its own allocation scheme on top of malloc called PyMalloc. +Valgrind my show some unexpected results when PyMalloc is used. +Starting with Python 2.3, PyMalloc is used by default. You can disable +PyMalloc when configuring python by adding the --without-pymalloc option. +If you disable PyMalloc, most of the information in this document and +the supplied suppressions file will not be useful. + +If you use valgrind on a default build of Python, you will see +many errors like: + + ==6399== Use of uninitialised value of size 4 + ==6399== at 0x4A9BDE7E: PyObject_Free (obmalloc.c:711) + ==6399== by 0x4A9B8198: dictresize (dictobject.c:477) + +These are expected and not a problem. Tim Peters explains +the situation: + + PyMalloc needs to know whether an arbitrary address is one + that's managed by it, or is managed by the system malloc. + The current scheme allows this to be determined in constant + time, regardless of how many memory areas are under pymalloc's + control. + + The memory pymalloc manages itself is in one or more "arenas", + each a large contiguous memory area obtained from malloc. + The base address of each arena is saved by pymalloc + in a vector, and a field at the start of each arena contains + the index of that arena's base address in that vector. + + Given an arbitrary address, pymalloc computes the arena base + address corresponding to it, then looks at "the index" stored + near there. If the index read up is out of bounds for the + vector of arena base addresses pymalloc maintains, then + pymalloc knows for certain that this address is not under + pymalloc's control. Otherwise the index is in bounds, and + pymalloc compares + + the arena base address stored at that index in the vector + + to + + the computed arena address + + pymalloc controls this arena if and only if they're equal. + + It doesn't matter whether the memory pymalloc reads up ("the + index") is initialized. If it's not initialized, then + whatever trash gets read up will lead pymalloc to conclude + (correctly) that the address isn't controlled by it. + + This determination has to be made on every call to one of + pymalloc's free/realloc entry points, so its speed is critical + (Python allocates and frees dynamic memory at a ferocious rate + -- everything in Python, from integers to "stack frames", + lives in the heap). |