diff options
| author | Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> | 2001-10-04 19:46:06 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> | 2001-10-04 19:46:06 (GMT) |
| commit | 50fda3ba267fe8c063ce83b832f349857ca7fdc3 (patch) | |
| tree | c3f6dbc629cdc436c1f7714dacab4227b444c7e0 /Misc | |
| parent | ba001a0b676f640b3a11dea48b2a13d9fc0be746 (diff) | |
| download | cpython-50fda3ba267fe8c063ce83b832f349857ca7fdc3.zip cpython-50fda3ba267fe8c063ce83b832f349857ca7fdc3.tar.gz cpython-50fda3ba267fe8c063ce83b832f349857ca7fdc3.tar.bz2 | |
Make new classes dynamic by default.
Diffstat (limited to 'Misc')
| -rw-r--r-- | Misc/NEWS | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -4,6 +4,16 @@ Release date: 28-Sep-2100 Type/class unification and new-style classes +- New-style classes are now dynamic by default. Previous, they were + static (meaning class attributes could not be assigned to) and + dynamic classes had to be requested by adding __dynamic__ = 1 to the + body of the class or to the module. Static classes are faster than + dynamic classes, but dynamic classes are now at most 50% slower than + static classes; previously, they could be up to 10x slower. (This + was accomplished by making dynamic classes faster, not by making + static classes slower. :-) Note that according to one benchmark, + static classes are about the same speed as classic classes. + - C.__doc__ now works as expected for new-style classes (in 2.2a4 it always returned None, even when there was a class docstring). |