diff options
| author | Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org> | 2006-02-27 00:24:13 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Wouters <thomas@python.org> | 2006-02-27 00:24:13 (GMT) |
| commit | dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e (patch) | |
| tree | d2b7aa53793110100965906b1266296d08bd4ec1 /Parser/Python.asdl | |
| parent | d3a5f53a27be821cfdff869fd8ad93a060497e8c (diff) | |
| download | cpython-dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e.zip cpython-dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e.tar.gz cpython-dca3b9c797f6dd4b08d590fa2aa1031e22ab598e.tar.bz2 | |
PEP 308 implementation, including minor refdocs and some testcases. It
breaks the parser module, because it adds the if/else construct as well as
two new grammar rules for backward compatibility. If no one else fixes
parsermodule, I guess I'll go ahead and fix it later this week.
The TeX code was checked with texcheck.py, but not rendered. There is
actually a slight incompatibility:
>>> (x for x in lambda:0)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
changes into
>>> (x for x in lambda: 0)
File "<stdin>", line 1
(x for x in lambda: 0)
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Since there's no way the former version can be useful, it's probably a
bugfix ;)
Diffstat (limited to 'Parser/Python.asdl')
| -rw-r--r-- | Parser/Python.asdl | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Parser/Python.asdl b/Parser/Python.asdl index b0d383f..1b7e698 100644 --- a/Parser/Python.asdl +++ b/Parser/Python.asdl @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ module Python | BinOp(expr left, operator op, expr right) | UnaryOp(unaryop op, expr operand) | Lambda(arguments args, expr body) + | IfExp(expr test, expr body, expr orelse) | Dict(expr* keys, expr* values) | ListComp(expr elt, comprehension* generators) | GeneratorExp(expr elt, comprehension* generators) |