diff options
author | Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> | 2024-04-29 14:41:26 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-04-29 14:41:26 (GMT) |
commit | 3989894a396c8c2abc78fcd8758542eed0f68912 (patch) | |
tree | d48a4a9bfdd8e92c3ce998358ba16583a286db29 /Python/Python-ast.c | |
parent | 817190c303e0650d7da5e52e82feb6505fc6b761 (diff) | |
download | cpython-3989894a396c8c2abc78fcd8758542eed0f68912.zip cpython-3989894a396c8c2abc78fcd8758542eed0f68912.tar.gz cpython-3989894a396c8c2abc78fcd8758542eed0f68912.tar.bz2 |
[3.12] gh-117566: fix IPv6Address.is_loopback for IPv4-mapped loopbacks (GH-117567) (GH-118391)
gh-117566: fix IPv6Address.is_loopback for IPv4-mapped loopbacks (GH-117567)
While properties like IPv6Address.is_private account for IPv4-mapped
IPv6 addresses, such as for example:
>>> ipaddress.ip_address("192.168.0.1").is_private
True
>>> ipaddress.ip_address("::ffff:192.168.0.1").is_private
True
...the same doesn't currently apply to the is_loopback property:
>>> ipaddress.ip_address("127.0.0.1").is_loopback
True
>>> ipaddress.ip_address("::ffff:127.0.0.1").is_loopback
False
At minimum, this inconsistency between different properties is
counter-intuitive. Moreover, ::ffff:127.0.0.0/104 is for all intents and
purposes a loopback address, and should be treated as such.
(cherry picked from commit fb7f79b4da35b75cdc82ff3cf20816d2bf93d416)
Co-authored-by: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Python/Python-ast.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions