summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py')
-rw-r--r--Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py556
1 files changed, 263 insertions, 293 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py b/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py
index fa01627..2409bf9 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py
@@ -1,303 +1,273 @@
import ConfigParser
import StringIO
+import unittest
-from test.test_support import TestFailed, verify
+from test import test_support
-def basic(src):
- print "Testing basic accessors..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
- cf.readfp(sio)
- L = cf.sections()
- L.sort()
- verify(L == [r'Commented Bar',
- r'Foo Bar',
- r'Internationalized Stuff',
- r'Long Line',
- r'Section\with$weird%characters[' '\t',
- r'Spaces',
- r'Spacey Bar',
- ],
- "unexpected list of section names")
-
- # The use of spaces in the section names serves as a regression test for
- # SourceForge bug #115357.
- # http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&group_id=5470&bug_id=115357
- verify(cf.get('Foo Bar', 'foo', raw=1) == 'bar')
- verify(cf.get('Spacey Bar', 'foo', raw=1) == 'bar')
- verify(cf.get('Commented Bar', 'foo', raw=1) == 'bar')
- verify(cf.get('Spaces', 'key with spaces', raw=1) == 'value')
- verify(cf.get('Spaces', 'another with spaces', raw=1) == 'splat!')
-
- verify('__name__' not in cf.options("Foo Bar"),
- '__name__ "option" should not be exposed by the API!')
-
- # Make sure the right things happen for remove_option();
- # added to include check for SourceForge bug #123324:
- verify(cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'),
- "remove_option() failed to report existance of option")
- verify(not cf.has_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'),
- "remove_option() failed to remove option")
- verify(not cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'),
- "remove_option() failed to report non-existance of option"
- " that was removed")
- try:
- cf.remove_option('No Such Section', 'foo')
- except ConfigParser.NoSectionError:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed(
- "remove_option() failed to report non-existance of option"
- " that never existed")
+class TestCaseBase(unittest.TestCase):
+ def newconfig(self, defaults=None):
+ if defaults is None:
+ self.cf = self.config_class()
+ else:
+ self.cf = self.config_class(defaults)
+ return self.cf
- verify(cf.get('Long Line', 'foo', raw=1) ==
+ def fromstring(self, string, defaults=None):
+ cf = self.newconfig(defaults)
+ sio = StringIO.StringIO(string)
+ cf.readfp(sio)
+ return cf
+
+ def test_basic(self):
+ cf = self.fromstring(
+ "[Foo Bar]\n"
+ "foo=bar\n"
+ "[Spacey Bar]\n"
+ "foo = bar\n"
+ "[Commented Bar]\n"
+ "foo: bar ; comment\n"
+ "[Long Line]\n"
+ "foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor\n"
+ " likes it.\n"
+ "[Section\\with$weird%characters[\t]\n"
+ "[Internationalized Stuff]\n"
+ "foo[bg]: Bulgarian\n"
+ "foo=Default\n"
+ "foo[en]=English\n"
+ "foo[de]=Deutsch\n"
+ "[Spaces]\n"
+ "key with spaces : value\n"
+ "another with spaces = splat!\n"
+ )
+ L = cf.sections()
+ L.sort()
+ eq = self.assertEqual
+ eq(L, [r'Commented Bar',
+ r'Foo Bar',
+ r'Internationalized Stuff',
+ r'Long Line',
+ r'Section\with$weird%characters[' '\t',
+ r'Spaces',
+ r'Spacey Bar',
+ ])
+
+ # The use of spaces in the section names serves as a
+ # regression test for SourceForge bug #583248:
+ # http://www.python.org/sf/583248
+ eq(cf.get('Foo Bar', 'foo'), 'bar')
+ eq(cf.get('Spacey Bar', 'foo'), 'bar')
+ eq(cf.get('Commented Bar', 'foo'), 'bar')
+ eq(cf.get('Spaces', 'key with spaces'), 'value')
+ eq(cf.get('Spaces', 'another with spaces'), 'splat!')
+
+ self.failIf('__name__' in cf.options("Foo Bar"),
+ '__name__ "option" should not be exposed by the API!')
+
+ # Make sure the right things happen for remove_option();
+ # added to include check for SourceForge bug #123324:
+ self.failUnless(cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'),
+ "remove_option() failed to report existance of option")
+ self.failIf(cf.has_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'),
+ "remove_option() failed to remove option")
+ self.failIf(cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'),
+ "remove_option() failed to report non-existance of option"
+ " that was removed")
+
+ self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.NoSectionError,
+ cf.remove_option, 'No Such Section', 'foo')
+
+ eq(cf.get('Long Line', 'foo'),
'this line is much, much longer than my editor\nlikes it.')
-
-def case_sensitivity():
- print "Testing case sensitivity..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- cf.add_section("A")
- cf.add_section("a")
- L = cf.sections()
- L.sort()
- verify(L == ["A", "a"])
- cf.set("a", "B", "value")
- verify(cf.options("a") == ["b"])
- verify(cf.get("a", "b", raw=1) == "value",
+ def test_case_sensitivity(self):
+ cf = self.newconfig()
+ cf.add_section("A")
+ cf.add_section("a")
+ L = cf.sections()
+ L.sort()
+ eq = self.assertEqual
+ eq(L, ["A", "a"])
+ cf.set("a", "B", "value")
+ eq(cf.options("a"), ["b"])
+ eq(cf.get("a", "b"), "value",
"could not locate option, expecting case-insensitive option names")
- verify(cf.has_option("a", "b"))
- cf.set("A", "A-B", "A-B value")
- for opt in ("a-b", "A-b", "a-B", "A-B"):
- verify(cf.has_option("A", opt),
- "has_option() returned false for option which should exist")
- verify(cf.options("A") == ["a-b"])
- verify(cf.options("a") == ["b"])
- cf.remove_option("a", "B")
- verify(cf.options("a") == [])
-
- # SF bug #432369:
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- sio = StringIO.StringIO("[MySection]\nOption: first line\n\tsecond line\n")
- cf.readfp(sio)
- verify(cf.options("MySection") == ["option"])
- verify(cf.get("MySection", "Option") == "first line\nsecond line")
-
- # SF bug #561822:
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser(defaults={"key":"value"})
- cf.readfp(StringIO.StringIO("[section]\nnekey=nevalue\n"))
- verify(cf.has_option("section", "Key"))
-
-
-def boolean(src):
- print "Testing interpretation of boolean Values..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
- cf.readfp(sio)
- for x in range(1, 5):
- verify(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 't%d' % (x)) == 1)
- for x in range(1, 5):
- verify(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 'f%d' % (x)) == 0)
- for x in range(1, 5):
- try:
- cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 'e%d' % (x))
- except ValueError:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed(
- "getboolean() failed to report a non boolean value")
-
-
-def interpolation(src):
- print "Testing value interpolation..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser({"getname": "%(__name__)s"})
- sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
- cf.readfp(sio)
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "getname") == "Foo")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar") == "something with interpolation (1 step)")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar9")
- == "something with lots of interpolation (9 steps)")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar10")
- == "something with lots of interpolation (10 steps)")
- expect_get_error(cf, ConfigParser.InterpolationDepthError, "Foo", "bar11")
-
- # Now make sure we don't interpolate if we use RawConfigParser:
- cf = ConfigParser.RawConfigParser({"getname": "%(__name__)s"})
- sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
- cf.readfp(sio)
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "getname") == "%(__name__)s")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar")
- == "something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar9")
- == "something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar10")
- == "something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)")
- verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar11")
- == "something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)")
-
-
-def parse_errors():
- print "Testing parse errors..."
- expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
- """[Foo]\n extra-spaces: splat\n""")
- expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
- """[Foo]\n extra-spaces= splat\n""")
- expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
- """[Foo]\noption-without-value\n""")
- expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
- """[Foo]\n:value-without-option-name\n""")
- expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
- """[Foo]\n=value-without-option-name\n""")
- expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.MissingSectionHeaderError,
- """No Section!\n""")
-
-
-def query_errors():
- print "Testing query interface..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- verify(cf.sections() == [],
- "new ConfigParser should have no defined sections")
- verify(not cf.has_section("Foo"),
- "new ConfigParser should have no acknowledged sections")
- try:
- cf.options("Foo")
- except ConfigParser.NoSectionError, e:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed(
- "Failed to catch expected NoSectionError from options()")
- try:
- cf.set("foo", "bar", "value")
- except ConfigParser.NoSectionError, e:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected NoSectionError from set()")
- expect_get_error(cf, ConfigParser.NoSectionError, "foo", "bar")
- cf.add_section("foo")
- expect_get_error(cf, ConfigParser.NoOptionError, "foo", "bar")
-
-
-def weird_errors():
- print "Testing miscellaneous error conditions..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- cf.add_section("Foo")
- try:
+ self.failUnless(cf.has_option("a", "b"))
+ cf.set("A", "A-B", "A-B value")
+ for opt in ("a-b", "A-b", "a-B", "A-B"):
+ self.failUnless(
+ cf.has_option("A", opt),
+ "has_option() returned false for option which should exist")
+ eq(cf.options("A"), ["a-b"])
+ eq(cf.options("a"), ["b"])
+ cf.remove_option("a", "B")
+ eq(cf.options("a"), [])
+
+ # SF bug #432369:
+ cf = self.fromstring(
+ "[MySection]\nOption: first line\n\tsecond line\n")
+ eq(cf.options("MySection"), ["option"])
+ eq(cf.get("MySection", "Option"), "first line\nsecond line")
+
+ # SF bug #561822:
+ cf = self.fromstring("[section]\nnekey=nevalue\n",
+ defaults={"key":"value"})
+ self.failUnless(cf.has_option("section", "Key"))
+
+
+ def test_parse_errors(self):
+ self.newconfig()
+ self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
+ "[Foo]\n extra-spaces: splat\n")
+ self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
+ "[Foo]\n extra-spaces= splat\n")
+ self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
+ "[Foo]\noption-without-value\n")
+ self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
+ "[Foo]\n:value-without-option-name\n")
+ self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError,
+ "[Foo]\n=value-without-option-name\n")
+ self.parse_error(ConfigParser.MissingSectionHeaderError,
+ "No Section!\n")
+
+ def parse_error(self, exc, src):
+ sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
+ self.assertRaises(exc, self.cf.readfp, sio)
+
+ def test_query_errors(self):
+ cf = self.newconfig()
+ self.assertEqual(cf.sections(), [],
+ "new ConfigParser should have no defined sections")
+ self.failIf(cf.has_section("Foo"),
+ "new ConfigParser should have no acknowledged sections")
+ self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.NoSectionError,
+ cf.options, "Foo")
+ self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.NoSectionError,
+ cf.set, "foo", "bar", "value")
+ self.get_error(ConfigParser.NoSectionError, "foo", "bar")
+ cf.add_section("foo")
+ self.get_error(ConfigParser.NoOptionError, "foo", "bar")
+
+ def get_error(self, exc, section, option):
+ self.assertRaises(exc, self.cf.get, section, option)
+
+ def test_boolean(self):
+ cf = self.fromstring(
+ "[BOOLTEST]\n"
+ "T1=1\n"
+ "T2=TRUE\n"
+ "T3=True\n"
+ "T4=oN\n"
+ "T5=yes\n"
+ "F1=0\n"
+ "F2=FALSE\n"
+ "F3=False\n"
+ "F4=oFF\n"
+ "F5=nO\n"
+ "E1=2\n"
+ "E2=foo\n"
+ "E3=-1\n"
+ "E4=0.1\n"
+ "E5=FALSE AND MORE"
+ )
+ for x in range(1, 5):
+ self.failUnless(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 't%d' % x))
+ self.failIf(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 'f%d' % x))
+ self.assertRaises(ValueError,
+ cf.getboolean, 'BOOLTEST', 'e%d' % x)
+
+ def test_weird_errors(self):
+ cf = self.newconfig()
cf.add_section("Foo")
- except ConfigParser.DuplicateSectionError, e:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected DuplicateSectionError")
-
-
-def expect_get_error(cf, exctype, section, option, raw=0):
- try:
- cf.get(section, option, raw=raw)
- except exctype, e:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected " + exctype.__name__)
-
-
-def expect_parse_error(exctype, src):
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
- try:
- cf.readfp(sio)
- except exctype, e:
- pass
- else:
- raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected " + exctype.__name__)
-
-
-# The long string literals present in the rest of the file screw up
-# font-lock in Emacs/XEmacs, so this stuff needs to stay near the end
-# of this file.
-
-def write(src):
- print "Testing writing of files..."
- cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser()
- sio = StringIO.StringIO(src)
- cf.readfp(sio)
- output = StringIO.StringIO()
- cf.write(output)
- verify(output, """[DEFAULT]
-foo = another very
- long line
-
-[Long Line]
-foo = this line is much, much longer than my editor
- likes it.
-""")
-
-
-basic(r"""
-[Foo Bar]
-foo=bar
-[Spacey Bar]
-foo = bar
-[Commented Bar]
-foo: bar ; comment
-[Long Line]
-foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor
- likes it.
-[Section\with$weird%characters[""" '\t' r"""]
-[Internationalized Stuff]
-foo[bg]: Bulgarian
-foo=Default
-foo[en]=English
-foo[de]=Deutsch
-[Spaces]
-key with spaces : value
-another with spaces = splat!
-""")
-write("""[Long Line]
-foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor
- likes it.
-[DEFAULT]
-foo: another very
- long line""")
-case_sensitivity()
-boolean(r"""
-[BOOLTEST]
-T1=1
-T2=TRUE
-T3=True
-T4=oN
-T5=yes
-F1=0
-F2=FALSE
-F3=False
-F4=oFF
-F5=nO
-E1=2
-E2=foo
-E3=-1
-E4=0.1
-E5=FALSE AND MORE
-""")
-interpolation(r"""
-[Foo]
-bar=something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)
-bar9=something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)
-bar10=something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)
-bar11=something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)
-with11=%(with10)s
-with10=%(with9)s
-with9=%(with8)s
-with8=%(with7)s
-with7=%(with6)s
-with6=%(with5)s
-with5=%(with4)s
-with4=%(with3)s
-with3=%(with2)s
-with2=%(with1)s
-with1=with
-
-[Mutual Recursion]
-foo=%(bar)s
-bar=%(foo)s
-""")
-parse_errors()
-query_errors()
-weird_errors()
+ self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.DuplicateSectionError,
+ cf.add_section, "Foo")
+
+ def test_write(self):
+ cf = self.fromstring(
+ "[Long Line]\n"
+ "foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor\n"
+ " likes it.\n"
+ "[DEFAULT]\n"
+ "foo: another very\n"
+ " long line"
+ )
+ output = StringIO.StringIO()
+ cf.write(output)
+ self.assertEqual(
+ output.getvalue(),
+ "[DEFAULT]\n"
+ "foo = another very\n"
+ "\tlong line\n"
+ "\n"
+ "[Long Line]\n"
+ "foo = this line is much, much longer than my editor\n"
+ "\tlikes it.\n"
+ "\n"
+ )
+
+ # shared by subclasses
+ def get_interpolation_config(self):
+ return self.fromstring(
+ "[Foo]\n"
+ "bar=something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)\n"
+ "bar9=something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)\n"
+ "bar10=something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)\n"
+ "bar11=something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)\n"
+ "with11=%(with10)s\n"
+ "with10=%(with9)s\n"
+ "with9=%(with8)s\n"
+ "with8=%(with7)s\n"
+ "with7=%(with6)s\n"
+ "with6=%(with5)s\n"
+ "with5=%(with4)s\n"
+ "with4=%(with3)s\n"
+ "with3=%(with2)s\n"
+ "with2=%(with1)s\n"
+ "with1=with\n"
+ "\n"
+ "[Mutual Recursion]\n"
+ "foo=%(bar)s\n"
+ "bar=%(foo)s\n",
+ defaults={"getname": "%(__name__)s"})
+
+
+class ConfigParserTestCase(TestCaseBase):
+ config_class = ConfigParser.ConfigParser
+
+ def test_interpolation(self):
+ cf = self.get_interpolation_config()
+ eq = self.assertEqual
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "getname"), "Foo")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar"), "something with interpolation (1 step)")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar9"),
+ "something with lots of interpolation (9 steps)")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar10"),
+ "something with lots of interpolation (10 steps)")
+ self.get_error(ConfigParser.InterpolationDepthError, "Foo", "bar11")
+
+
+class RawConfigParserTestCase(TestCaseBase):
+ config_class = ConfigParser.RawConfigParser
+
+ def test_interpolation(self):
+ cf = self.get_interpolation_config()
+ eq = self.assertEqual
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "getname"), "%(__name__)s")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar"),
+ "something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar9"),
+ "something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar10"),
+ "something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)")
+ eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar11"),
+ "something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)")
+
+
+def test_main():
+ suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+ suite.addTests([unittest.makeSuite(ConfigParserTestCase),
+ unittest.makeSuite(RawConfigParserTestCase)])
+ test_support.run_suite(suite)
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+ test_main()