diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py | 1300 |
1 files changed, 1300 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py b/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..373ace9 --- /dev/null +++ b/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py @@ -0,0 +1,1300 @@ +import sys +import types + + +import unittest + + +class Test_TestLoader(unittest.TestCase): + + ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase + ################################################################ + + # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived + # class testCaseClass" + def test_loadTestsFromTestCase(self): + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + + tests = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]) + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests) + + # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived + # class testCaseClass" + # + # Make sure it does the right thing even if no tests were found + def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__no_matches(self): + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def foo_bar(self): pass + + empty_suite = unittest.TestSuite() + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), empty_suite) + + # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived + # class testCaseClass" + # + # What happens if loadTestsFromTestCase() is given an object + # that isn't a subclass of TestCase? Specifically, what happens + # if testCaseClass is a subclass of TestSuite? + # + # This is checked for specifically in the code, so we better add a + # test for it. + def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__TestSuite_subclass(self): + class NotATestCase(unittest.TestSuite): + pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(NotATestCase) + except TypeError: + pass + else: + self.fail('Should raise TypeError') + + # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived + # class testCaseClass" + # + # Make sure loadTestsFromTestCase() picks up the default test method + # name (as specified by TestCase), even though the method name does + # not match the default TestLoader.testMethodPrefix string + def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__default_method_name(self): + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def runTest(self): + pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + # This has to be false for the test to succeed + self.assertFalse('runTest'.startswith(loader.testMethodPrefix)) + + suite = loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [Foo('runTest')]) + + ################################################################ + ### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase + + ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromModule + ################################################################ + + # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase" + def test_loadTestsFromModule__TestCase_subclass(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + expected = [loader.suiteClass([MyTestCase('test')])] + self.assertEqual(list(suite), expected) + + # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase" + # + # What happens if no tests are found (no TestCase instances)? + def test_loadTestsFromModule__no_TestCase_instances(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), []) + + # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase" + # + # What happens if no tests are found (TestCases instances, but no tests)? + def test_loadTestsFromModule__no_TestCase_tests(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [loader.suiteClass()]) + + # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"s + # + # What happens if loadTestsFromModule() is given something other + # than a module? + # + # XXX Currently, it succeeds anyway. This flexibility + # should either be documented or loadTestsFromModule() should + # raise a TypeError + # + # XXX Certain people are using this behaviour. We'll add a test for it + def test_loadTestsFromModule__not_a_module(self): + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + + class NotAModule(object): + test_2 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(NotAModule) + + reference = [unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])] + self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference) + + + # Check that loadTestsFromModule honors (or not) a module + # with a load_tests function. + def test_loadTestsFromModule__load_tests(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + load_tests_args = [] + def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern): + self.assertIsInstance(tests, unittest.TestSuite) + load_tests_args.extend((loader, tests, pattern)) + return tests + m.load_tests = load_tests + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, unittest.TestSuite) + self.assertEquals(load_tests_args, [loader, suite, None]) + + load_tests_args = [] + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m, use_load_tests=False) + self.assertEquals(load_tests_args, []) + + def test_loadTestsFromModule__faulty_load_tests(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + + def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern): + raise TypeError('some failure') + m.load_tests = load_tests + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, unittest.TestSuite) + self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 1) + test = list(suite)[0] + + self.assertRaisesRegexp(TypeError, "some failure", test.m) + + ################################################################ + ### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromModule() + + ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromName() + ################################################################ + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # Is ValueError raised in response to an empty name? + def test_loadTestsFromName__empty_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('') + except ValueError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "Empty module name") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # What happens when the name contains invalid characters? + def test_loadTestsFromName__malformed_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + # XXX Should this raise ValueError or ImportError? + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('abc () //') + except ValueError: + pass + except ImportError: + pass + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to a + # module" + # + # What happens when a module by that name can't be found? + def test_loadTestsFromName__unknown_module_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('sdasfasfasdf') + except ImportError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "No module named sdasfasfasdf") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ImportError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # What happens when the module is found, but the attribute can't? + def test_loadTestsFromName__unknown_attr_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('unittest.sdasfasfasdf') + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # What happens when we provide the module, but the attribute can't be + # found? + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_unknown_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('sdasfasfasdf', unittest) + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # Does loadTestsFromName raise ValueError when passed an empty + # name relative to a provided module? + # + # XXX Should probably raise a ValueError instead of an AttributeError + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_empty_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('', unittest) + except AttributeError as e: + pass + else: + self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # What happens when an impossible name is given, relative to the provided + # `module`? + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_malformed_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + # XXX Should this raise AttributeError or ValueError? + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('abc () //', unittest) + except ValueError: + pass + except AttributeError: + pass + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # Does loadTestsFromName raise TypeError when the `module` argument + # isn't a module object? + # + # XXX Accepts the not-a-module object, ignorning the object's type + # This should raise an exception or the method name should be changed + # + # XXX Some people are relying on this, so keep it for now + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_not_a_module(self): + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + + class NotAModule(object): + test_2 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('test_2', NotAModule) + + reference = [MyTestCase('test')] + self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # Does it raise an exception if the name resolves to an invalid + # object? + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_bad_object(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + m.testcase_1 = object() + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1', m) + except TypeError: + pass + else: + self.fail("Should have raised TypeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may + # resolve either to ... a test case class" + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_TestCase_subclass(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_TestSuite(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testsuite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')]) + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testsuite', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a test method within a test case class" + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_testmethod(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.test', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # Does loadTestsFromName() raise the proper exception when trying to + # resolve "a test method within a test case class" that doesn't exist + # for the given name (relative to a provided module)? + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_invalid_testmethod(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.testfoo', m) + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "type object 'MyTestCase' has no attribute 'testfoo'") + else: + self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a ... TestSuite instance" + def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestSuite(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + testcase_2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + def return_TestSuite(): + return unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2]) + m.return_TestSuite = return_TestSuite + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestSuite', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1, testcase_2]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance" + def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestCase_instance(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + def return_TestCase(): + return testcase_1 + m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestCase', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance" + #***************************************************************** + #Override the suiteClass attribute to ensure that the suiteClass + #attribute is used + def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestCase_instance_ProperSuiteClass(self): + class SubTestSuite(unittest.TestSuite): + pass + m = types.ModuleType('m') + testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + def return_TestCase(): + return testcase_1 + m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.suiteClass = SubTestSuite + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestCase', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a test method within a test case class" + #***************************************************************** + #Override the suiteClass attribute to ensure that the suiteClass + #attribute is used + def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_testmethod_ProperSuiteClass(self): + class SubTestSuite(unittest.TestSuite): + pass + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.suiteClass=SubTestSuite + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.test', m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance" + # + # What happens if the callable returns something else? + def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__wrong_type(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + def return_wrong(): + return 6 + m.return_wrong = return_wrong + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_wrong', m) + except TypeError: + pass + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise TypeError") + + # "The specifier can refer to modules and packages which have not been + # imported; they will be imported as a side-effect" + def test_loadTestsFromName__module_not_loaded(self): + # We're going to try to load this module as a side-effect, so it + # better not be loaded before we try. + # + # Why pick audioop? Google shows it isn't used very often, so there's + # a good chance that it won't be imported when this test is run + module_name = 'audioop' + + if module_name in sys.modules: + del sys.modules[module_name] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + suite = loader.loadTestsFromName(module_name) + + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), []) + + # audioop should now be loaded, thanks to loadTestsFromName() + self.assertIn(module_name, sys.modules) + finally: + if module_name in sys.modules: + del sys.modules[module_name] + + ################################################################ + ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromName() + + ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames() + ################################################################ + + # "Similar to loadTestsFromName(), but takes a sequence of names rather + # than a single name." + # + # What happens if that sequence of names is empty? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__empty_name_list(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([]) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), []) + + # "Similar to loadTestsFromName(), but takes a sequence of names rather + # than a single name." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # What happens if that sequence of names is empty? + # + # XXX Should this raise a ValueError or just return an empty TestSuite? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_empty_name_list(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([], unittest) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), []) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # Is ValueError raised in response to an empty name? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__empty_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['']) + except ValueError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "Empty module name") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # What happens when presented with an impossible module name? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__malformed_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + # XXX Should this raise ValueError or ImportError? + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['abc () //']) + except ValueError: + pass + except ImportError: + pass + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # What happens when no module can be found for the given name? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_module_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['sdasfasfasdf']) + except ImportError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "No module named sdasfasfasdf") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ImportError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # What happens when the module can be found, but not the attribute? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_attr_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['unittest.sdasfasfasdf', 'unittest']) + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # What happens when given an unknown attribute on a specified `module` + # argument? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_name_relative_1(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['sdasfasfasdf'], unittest) + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # Do unknown attributes (relative to a provided module) still raise an + # exception even in the presence of valid attribute names? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_name_relative_2(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['TestCase', 'sdasfasfasdf'], unittest) + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'") + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # What happens when faced with the empty string? + # + # XXX This currently raises AttributeError, though ValueError is probably + # more appropriate + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_empty_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames([''], unittest) + except AttributeError: + pass + else: + self.fail("Failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # ... + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # What happens when presented with an impossible attribute name? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_malformed_name(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + # XXX Should this raise AttributeError or ValueError? + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['abc () //'], unittest) + except AttributeError: + pass + except ValueError: + pass + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError") + + # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module" + # + # Does loadTestsFromNames() make sure the provided `module` is in fact + # a module? + # + # XXX This validation is currently not done. This flexibility should + # either be documented or a TypeError should be raised. + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_not_a_module(self): + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + + class NotAModule(object): + test_2 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['test_2'], NotAModule) + + reference = [unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])] + self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to + # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method + # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a + # TestCase or TestSuite instance." + # + # Does it raise an exception if the name resolves to an invalid + # object? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_bad_object(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + m.testcase_1 = object() + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1'], m) + except TypeError: + pass + else: + self.fail("Should have raised TypeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a test case class" + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_TestCase_subclass(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1'], m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + expected = loader.suiteClass([MyTestCase('test')]) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [expected]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a TestSuite instance" + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_TestSuite(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testsuite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')]) + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testsuite'], m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [m.testsuite]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to ... a + # test method within a test case class" + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_testmethod(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1.test'], m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')]) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to ... a + # test method within a test case class" + # + # Does the method gracefully handle names that initially look like they + # resolve to "a test method within a test case class" but don't? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_invalid_testmethod(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1.testfoo'], m) + except AttributeError as e: + self.assertEqual(str(e), "type object 'MyTestCase' has no attribute 'testfoo'") + else: + self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError") + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a ... TestSuite instance" + def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__TestSuite(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + testcase_2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + def return_TestSuite(): + return unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2]) + m.return_TestSuite = return_TestSuite + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_TestSuite'], m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + expected = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2]) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [expected]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance" + def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__TestCase_instance(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None) + def return_TestCase(): + return testcase_1 + m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_TestCase'], m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1]) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance" + # + # Are staticmethods handled correctly? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__call_staticmethod(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Test1(unittest.TestCase): + def test(self): + pass + + testcase_1 = Test1('test') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + @staticmethod + def foo(): + return testcase_1 + m.Foo = Foo + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo.foo'], m) + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + + ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1]) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite]) + + # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to + # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance" + # + # What happens when the callable returns something else? + def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__wrong_type(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + def return_wrong(): + return 6 + m.return_wrong = return_wrong + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_wrong'], m) + except TypeError: + pass + else: + self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise TypeError") + + # "The specifier can refer to modules and packages which have not been + # imported; they will be imported as a side-effect" + def test_loadTestsFromNames__module_not_loaded(self): + # We're going to try to load this module as a side-effect, so it + # better not be loaded before we try. + # + # Why pick audioop? Google shows it isn't used very often, so there's + # a good chance that it won't be imported when this test is run + module_name = 'audioop' + + if module_name in sys.modules: + del sys.modules[module_name] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + try: + suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([module_name]) + + self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass) + self.assertEqual(list(suite), [unittest.TestSuite()]) + + # audioop should now be loaded, thanks to loadTestsFromName() + self.assertIn(module_name, sys.modules) + finally: + if module_name in sys.modules: + del sys.modules[module_name] + + ################################################################ + ### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames() + + ### Tests for TestLoader.getTestCaseNames() + ################################################################ + + # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass" + # + # Test.foobar is defined to make sure getTestCaseNames() respects + # loader.testMethodPrefix + def test_getTestCaseNames(self): + class Test(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foobar(self): pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Test), ['test_1', 'test_2']) + + # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass" + # + # Does getTestCaseNames() behave appropriately if no tests are found? + def test_getTestCaseNames__no_tests(self): + class Test(unittest.TestCase): + def foobar(self): pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Test), []) + + # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass" + # + # Are not-TestCases handled gracefully? + # + # XXX This should raise a TypeError, not return a list + # + # XXX It's too late in the 2.5 release cycle to fix this, but it should + # probably be revisited for 2.6 + def test_getTestCaseNames__not_a_TestCase(self): + class BadCase(int): + def test_foo(self): + pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + names = loader.getTestCaseNames(BadCase) + + self.assertEqual(names, ['test_foo']) + + # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass" + # + # Make sure inherited names are handled. + # + # TestP.foobar is defined to make sure getTestCaseNames() respects + # loader.testMethodPrefix + def test_getTestCaseNames__inheritance(self): + class TestP(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foobar(self): pass + + class TestC(TestP): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_3(self): pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + names = ['test_1', 'test_2', 'test_3'] + self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(TestC), names) + + ################################################################ + ### /Tests for TestLoader.getTestCaseNames() + + ### Tests for TestLoader.testMethodPrefix + ################################################################ + + # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as + # test methods" + # + # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by + # all loadTestsFrom* methods. + def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromTestCase(self): + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + + tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')]) + tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]) + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo' + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests_1) + + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test' + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests_2) + + # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as + # test methods" + # + # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by + # all loadTestsFrom* methods. + def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromModule(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + tests_1 = [unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])] + tests_2 = [unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo' + self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests_1) + + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test' + self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests_2) + + # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as + # test methods" + # + # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by + # all loadTestsFrom* methods. + def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromName(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')]) + tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]) + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo' + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests_1) + + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test' + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests_2) + + # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as + # test methods" + # + # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by + # all loadTestsFrom* methods. + def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromNames(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])]) + tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]) + tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([tests_2]) + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo' + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests_1) + + loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test' + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests_2) + + # "The default value is 'test'" + def test_testMethodPrefix__default_value(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + self.assertEqual(loader.testMethodPrefix, 'test') + + ################################################################ + ### /Tests for TestLoader.testMethodPrefix + + ### Tests for TestLoader.sortTestMethodsUsing + ################################################################ + + # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in + # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods" + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromTestCase(self): + def reversed_cmp(x, y): + return -((x > y) - (x < y)) + + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp + + tests = loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')]) + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests) + + # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in + # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods" + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromModule(self): + def reversed_cmp(x, y): + return -((x > y) - (x < y)) + + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp + + tests = [loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])] + self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests) + + # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in + # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods" + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromName(self): + def reversed_cmp(x, y): + return -((x > y) - (x < y)) + + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp + + tests = loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')]) + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests) + + # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in + # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods" + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromNames(self): + def reversed_cmp(x, y): + return -((x > y) - (x < y)) + + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp + + tests = [loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])] + self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m)), tests) + + # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in + # getTestCaseNames()" + # + # Does it actually affect getTestCaseNames()? + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__getTestCaseNames(self): + def reversed_cmp(x, y): + return -((x > y) - (x < y)) + + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp + + test_names = ['test_2', 'test_1'] + self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo), test_names) + + # "The default value is the built-in cmp() function" + # Since cmp is now defunct, we simply verify that the results + # occur in the same order as they would with the default sort. + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__default_value(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_2(self): pass + def test_3(self): pass + def test_1(self): pass + + test_names = ['test_2', 'test_3', 'test_1'] + self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo), sorted(test_names)) + + + # "it can be set to None to disable the sort." + # + # XXX How is this different from reassigning cmp? Are the tests returned + # in a random order or something? This behaviour should die + def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__None(self): + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = None + + test_names = ['test_2', 'test_1'] + self.assertEqual(set(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo)), set(test_names)) + + ################################################################ + ### /Tests for TestLoader.sortTestMethodsUsing + + ### Tests for TestLoader.suiteClass + ################################################################ + + # "Callable object that constructs a test suite from a list of tests." + def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromTestCase(self): + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + + tests = [Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.suiteClass = list + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests) + + # It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that + # all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure + def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromModule(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + tests = [[Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.suiteClass = list + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m), tests) + + # It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that + # all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure + def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromName(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + tests = [Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.suiteClass = list + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests) + + # It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that + # all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure + def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromNames(self): + m = types.ModuleType('m') + class Foo(unittest.TestCase): + def test_1(self): pass + def test_2(self): pass + def foo_bar(self): pass + m.Foo = Foo + + tests = [[Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]] + + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + loader.suiteClass = list + self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests) + + # "The default value is the TestSuite class" + def test_suiteClass__default_value(self): + loader = unittest.TestLoader() + self.assertTrue(loader.suiteClass is unittest.TestSuite) |