| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
* | Note that 2.0.1 is also a PSF release. (Gregor Hoffleit, SF #433223.) | Guido van Rossum | 2001-06-14 | 1 | -5/+4 |
|
|
* | Make the license GPL-compatible. | Guido van Rossum | 2001-05-04 | 1 | -16/+5 |
|
|
* | Tim convinced me to augment the PSF license with a final clause just | Guido van Rossum | 2001-04-13 | 1 | -0/+4 |
|
|
* | Oops. Need an extra blank line after the PSF license. | Guido van Rossum | 2001-04-13 | 1 | -0/+1 |
|
|
* | - Inserted the (tentative) PSF license. | Guido van Rossum | 2001-04-13 | 1 | -9/+64 |
|
|
* | Correct the header over the string of licenses -- it's "PYTHON", not | Guido van Rossum | 2001-04-10 | 1 | -2/+2 |
|
|
* | Fix typo in history. | Thomas Wouters | 2001-03-22 | 1 | -1/+1 |
|
|
* | Updated history. Incorporated 1.6.1 license. | Guido van Rossum | 2001-03-22 | 1 | -67/+76 |
|
|
* | Add note about copyright ownership and license situation. | Guido van Rossum | 2001-01-18 | 1 | -0/+10 |
|
|
* | Typo detected by "the miraculous Debian package lint tool "lintian" | Guido van Rossum | 2000-12-12 | 1 | -1/+1 |
|
|
* | Place the full text of the CNRI license verbatim in the LICENSE file. | Guido van Rossum | 2000-10-10 | 1 | -5/+67 |
|
|
* | Since it looks like the dual license clause may be neither necessary | Guido van Rossum | 2000-09-05 | 1 | -11/+5 |
|
|
* | Changes in license names by BobW. | Guido van Rossum | 2000-09-04 | 1 | -3/+3 |
|
|
* | Properly name and number the BEOPEN OPEN SOURCE PYTHON LICENSE | Guido van Rossum | 2000-09-03 | 1 | -7/+5 |
|
|
* | Various edits. Most importantly, added dual licensing. Also some | Guido van Rossum | 2000-09-03 | 1 | -34/+41 |
|
|
* | Tentative license. Could still change for the 2.0b1 release and will | Guido van Rossum | 2000-09-01 | 1 | -1/+103 |
|
|
* | Adding a LICENSE file so we can have it in the 1.6 release. | Guido van Rossum | 2000-08-02 | 1 | -0/+1 |
|
|