summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Lib/test/test_extcall.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* adding passing test. testing for g(*Nothing()) where Nothing is a ↵Samuele Pedroni2004-02-211-0/+25
| | | | user-defined iterator.
* SF bug #733667: kwargs handled incorrectlyRaymond Hettinger2003-05-311-0/+11
| | | | | The fast_function() inlining optimization only applies when there are zero keyword arguments.
* Get rid of many apply() calls.Guido van Rossum2003-02-271-1/+1
|
* Complete the absolute import patch for the test suite. All relativeBarry Warsaw2002-07-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | imports of test modules now import from the test package. Other related oddities are also fixed (like DeprecationWarning filters that weren't specifying the full import part, etc.). Also did a general code cleanup to remove all "from test.test_support import *"'s. Other from...import *'s weren't changed.
* Quick and dirty fix for test_extcall failures trigged by Guido'sBarry Warsaw2001-08-241-2/+6
| | | | | | | recent classobject.c change. When calling an unbound method with no instances as first argument, the error message has changed. The message now contains the class name, but the output text being compared to is too generic, so skip printing it.
* Get rid of the superstitious "~" in dict hashing's "i = (~hash) & mask".Tim Peters2001-05-131-11/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The comment following used to say: /* We use ~hash instead of hash, as degenerate hash functions, such as for ints <sigh>, can have lots of leading zeros. It's not really a performance risk, but better safe than sorry. 12-Dec-00 tim: so ~hash produces lots of leading ones instead -- what's the gain? */ That is, there was never a good reason for doing it. And to the contrary, as explained on Python-Dev last December, it tended to make the *sum* (i + incr) & mask (which is the first table index examined in case of collison) the same "too often" across distinct hashes. Changing to the simpler "i = hash & mask" reduced the number of string-dict collisions (== # number of times we go around the lookup for-loop) from about 6 million to 5 million during a full run of the test suite (these are approximate because the test suite does some random stuff from run to run). The number of collisions in non-string dicts also decreased, but not as dramatically. Note that this may, for a given dict, change the order (wrt previous releases) of entries exposed by .keys(), .values() and .items(). A number of std tests suffered bogus failures as a result. For dicts keyed by small ints, or (less so) by characters, the order is much more likely to be in increasing order of key now; e.g., >>> d = {} >>> for i in range(10): ... d[i] = i ... >>> d {0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9} >>> Unfortunately. people may latch on to that in small examples and draw a bogus conclusion. test_support.py Moved test_extcall's sortdict() into test_support, made it stronger, and imported sortdict into other std tests that needed it. test_unicode.py Excluced cp875 from the "roundtrip over range(128)" test, because cp875 doesn't have a well-defined inverse for unicode("?", "cp875"). See Python-Dev for excruciating details. Cookie.py Chaged various output functions to sort dicts before building strings from them. test_extcall Fiddled the expected-result file. This remains sensitive to native dict ordering, because, e.g., if there are multiple errors in a keyword-arg dict (and test_extcall sets up many cases like that), the specific error Python complains about first depends on native dict ordering.
* Generalize tuple() to work nicely with iterators.Tim Peters2001-05-051-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | NEEDS DOC CHANGES. This one surprised me! While I expected tuple() to be a no-brainer, turns out it's actually dripping with consequences: 1. It will *allow* the popular PySequence_Fast() to work with any iterable object (code for that not yet checked in, but should be trivial). 2. It caused two std tests to fail. This because some places used PyTuple_Sequence() (the C spelling of tuple()) as an indirect way to test whether something *is* a sequence. But tuple() code only looked for the existence of sq->item to determine that, and e.g. an instance passed that test whether or not it supported the other operations tuple() needed (e.g., __len__). So some things the tests *expected* to fail with an AttributeError now fail with a TypeError instead. This looks like an improvement to me; e.g., test_coercion used to produce 559 TypeErrors and 2 AttributeErrors, and now they're all TypeErrors. The error details are more informative too, because the places calling this were *looking* for TypeErrors in order to replace the generic tuple() "not a sequence" msg with their own more specific text, and AttributeErrors snuck by that.
* Test cases for examples of ext call error handling.Jeremy Hylton2001-04-111-0/+35
| | | | Fix to SF bug #414743 based on Michael Hudson's patch #414750.
* String method conversion.Eric S. Raymond2001-02-091-2/+1
|
* Patch #103344: Sort dicts from extcall for easier comparison with Jython.Tim Peters2001-01-211-5/+13
|
* a bold attempt to fix things broken by MAL's verify patch: importFredrik Lundh2001-01-171-2/+1
| | | | 'verify' iff it's used by a test module...
* This patch removes all uses of "assert" in the regression test suiteMarc-André Lemburg2001-01-171-3/+4
| | | | | | | and replaces them with a new API verify(). As a result the regression suite will also perform its tests in optimization mode. Written by Marc-Andre Lemburg. Copyright assigned to Guido van Rossum.
* This patch makes sure that the function name always appears in the errorKa-Ping Yee2001-01-151-0/+30
| | | | | | | message, and tries to make the messages more consistent and helpful when the wrong number of arguments or duplicate keyword arguments are supplied. Comes with more tests for test_extcall.py and and an update to an error message in test/output/test_pyexpat.
* When a PyCFunction that takes only positional parameters is called withFred Drake2001-01-041-1/+11
| | | | | | | | | | an empty keywords dictionary (via apply() or the extended call syntax), the keywords dict should be ignored. If the keywords dict is not empty, TypeError should be raised. (Between the restructuring of the call machinery and this patch, an empty dict in this situation would trigger a SystemError via PyErr_BadInternalCall().) Added regression tests to detect errors for this.
* Fix for SF bug #117241Jeremy Hylton2000-10-301-0/+18
| | | | | | | | | When a method is called with no regular arguments and * args, defer the first arg is subclass check until after the * args have been expanded. N.B. The CALL_FUNCTION implementation is getting really hairy; should review it to see if it can be simplified.
* Make reindent.py happy (convert everything to 4-space indents!).Fred Drake2000-10-231-6/+6
|
* Break a cycle created in the saboteur() function.Vladimir Marangozov2000-07-151-2/+5
|
* Don't be so strict in checking AttributeError -- the error messageGuido van Rossum2000-04-101-2/+2
| | | | recently changed.
* Two fixes for extended call syntax:Jeremy Hylton2000-03-301-0/+44
| | | | | | | If a non-tuple sequence is passed as the *arg, convert it to a tuple before checking its length. If named keyword arguments are used in combination with **kwargs, make a copy of kwargs before inserting the new keys.
* fix previous checkinJeremy Hylton2000-03-281-1/+1
|
* add test cases for Greg Ewing's extended call syntax patchJeremy Hylton2000-03-281-0/+99