| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
It seems that the new class HTTP11 in httplib.test() isn't
discoverable by pyclbr, which causes this test to fail.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Taught doctest about static methods, class methods, and property docstrings
in new-style classes. As for inspect.py/pydoc.py before it, the new stuff
needed didn't really fit into the old architecture (but was less of a
strain to force-fit here).
New-style class docstrings still aren't found, but that's the subject
of a different bug and I want to fix that right instead of hacking around
it in doctest.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from Tim Hochberg. Also mucho fiddling to change the way doctest
determines whether a thing is a function, module or class. Under 2.2,
this really requires the functions in inspect.py (e.g., types.ClassType
is close to meaningless now, if not outright misleading).
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
allows using the tests with unittest.py as a script. The tests will
still run when run as a script themselves.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of PyMapping_Keys because we know we have a real dict. Tolerate that
objects may have an attr named "__dict__" that's not a dict (Py_None
popped up during testing).
test_descr.py, test_dir(): Test the new classic-class behavior; beef up
the new-style class test similarly.
test_pyclbr.py, checkModule(): dir(C) is no longer a synonym for
C.__dict__.keys() when C is a classic class (looks like the same thing
that burned distutils! -- should it be *made* a synoym again? Then it
would be inconsistent with new-style class behavior.).
|
| | |
|
| |
|
