| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Vajrasky Kok.
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Ludwig Hähne.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/py3k
........
r87942 | alexander.belopolsky | 2011-01-11 16:44:00 -0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2011) | 3 lines
Issue #5109: array.array constructor will now use fast code when
initial data is provided in an array object with correct type.
........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/py3k
........
r83751 | mark.dickinson | 2010-08-06 10:36:57 +0100 (Fri, 06 Aug 2010) | 1 line
Issue #9526: Remove outdated casts to int that were preventing the array module from working correctly with arrays > 2GB.
........
r83752 | mark.dickinson | 2010-08-06 10:38:58 +0100 (Fri, 06 Aug 2010) | 1 line
Misc/NEWS entry for r83751.
........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/py3k
........
r83030 | antoine.pitrou | 2010-07-21 18:41:31 +0200 (mer., 21 juil. 2010) | 5 lines
Issue #5395: check that array.fromfile() re-raises an IOError instead of replacing it
with EOFError.
(this is only an added test, but 2.x will get a fix too)
........
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
step value. Patch by Marcin Bachry.
|
|
|
|
| |
across different machine architectures and compatibility with Python 3.x.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
was not always being done properly in some python types and extension
modules. PyMem_MALLOC, PyMem_REALLOC, PyMem_NEW and PyMem_RESIZE have
all been updated to perform better checks and places in the code that
would previously leak memory on the error path when such an allocation
failed have been fixed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It caused: "Fatal Python error: UNREF invalid object" in the DoubleTest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added checks for integer overflows, contributed by Google. Some are
only available if asserts are left in the code, in cases where they
can't be triggered from Python code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/079988.html
Python 2.6 should stick with PyString_* in its codebase. The PyBytes_* names
in the spirit of 3.0 are available via a #define only. See the email thread.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Py_REFCNT. Macros for b/w compatibility are available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Specialcase extended slices that amount to a shallow copy the same way as
is done for simple slices, in the tuple, string and unicode case.
- Specialcase step-1 extended slices to optimize the common case for all
involved types.
- For lists, allow extended slice assignment of differing lengths as long
as the step is 1. (Previously, 'l[:2:1] = []' failed even though
'l[:2] = []' and 'l[:2:None] = []' do not.)
- Implement extended slicing for buffer, array, structseq, mmap and
UserString.UserString.
- Implement slice-object support (but not non-step-1 slice assignment) for
UserString.MutableString.
- Add tests for all new functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
backwards compatibility. Add Py_Refcnt, Py_Type, Py_Size, and
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
types.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
array.__deepcopy__() needs to take an argument, even if it doesn't actually
use it. Will backport to 2.5 and 2.4 (if applicable.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I modified this patch some by fixing style, some error checking, and adding
XXX comments. This patch requires review and some changes are to be expected.
I'm checking in now to get the greatest possible review and establish a
baseline for moving forward. I don't want this to hold up release if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first batch of fixes that should be easy to verify based on context.
This fixes problem numbers: 220 (ast), 323-324 (symtable),
321-322 (structseq), 215 (array), 210 (hotshot), 182 (codecs), 209 (etree).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- update header checks, using autoconf
- provide dummies for getenv, environ, and GetVersion
- adjust MSC_VER check in socketmodule.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the char buffer was requested. Now it actually returns the char buffer if
available or raises a TypeError if it isn't (as is raised for the other buffer
types if they are not present but requested).
Not a backport candidate since it does change semantics of the buffer object
(although it could be argued this is enough of a bug to bother backporting).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Added socket.recv_buf() and socket.recvfrom_buf() methods, that use the buffer
protocol (send and sendto already did).
* Added struct.pack_to(), that is the corresponding buffer compatible method to
unpack_from().
* Fixed minor typos in arraymodule.
|
|
|
|
| |
under C++ though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using a custom, nearly-identical macro. This probably changes how some of
these functions are compiled, which may result in fractionally slower (or
faster) execution. Considering the nature of traversal, visiting much of the
address space in unpredictable patterns, I'd argue the code readability and
maintainability is well worth it ;P
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was mostly written by Travis Oliphant.
I've inspected it all; Neal Norwitz and MvL have also looked at it
(in an earlier incarnation).
|
|
|
|
| |
(reviewed by Neal Norwitz)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Probably should be backported.
|
|
|
|
| |
(fixes bug #1119418)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Made the constructor accept general iterables.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
array.extend() now accepts iterable arguments implements as a series
of appends. Besides being a user convenience and matching the behavior
for lists, this the saves memory and cycles that would be used to
create a temporary array object.
|