| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
supporting objects as input no matter how it was compiled (built in
implementations or external openssl library).
(backported from a py3k branch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/079988.html
Python 2.6 should stick with PyString_* in its codebase. The PyBytes_* names
in the spirit of 3.0 are available via a #define only. See the email thread.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Py_REFCNT. Macros for b/w compatibility are available.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
backwards compatibility. Add Py_Refcnt, Py_Type, Py_Size, and
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT.
|
|
|
|
| |
Use Py_UnpackTuple instead of PyArg_ParseTuple where possible.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Probably should be backported.
|
|
|
|
| |
Supresses numerous pages of compiler warnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In C++, it's an error to pass a string literal to a char* function
without a const_cast(). Rather than require every C++ extension
module to put a cast around string literals, fix the API to state the
const-ness.
I focused on parts of the API where people usually pass literals:
PyArg_ParseTuple() and friends, Py_BuildValue(), PyMethodDef, the type
slots, etc. Predictably, there were a large set of functions that
needed to be fixed as a result of these changes. The most pervasive
change was to make the keyword args list passed to
PyArg_ParseTupleAndKewords() to be a const char *kwlist[].
One cast was required as a result of the changes: A type object
mallocs the memory for its tp_doc slot and later frees it.
PyTypeObject says that tp_doc is const char *; but if the type was
created by type_new(), we know it is safe to cast to char *.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
VC++6 doesn't accept them.
This *will* result in tons of the following warning from gcc 3.x:
(gcc "2.96ish" doesn't issue this warning)
warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
the code compiles fine regardless. squashing the gcc warnings
is the next task.
Would someone on windows please confirm that this does or does not
compile and if it does or does not pass the test_hashlib.py unit
tests.
|
|
A new hashlib module to replace the md5 and sha modules. It adds
support for additional secure hashes such as SHA-256 and SHA-512. The
hashlib module uses OpenSSL for fast platform optimized
implementations of algorithms when available. The old md5 and sha
modules still exist as wrappers around hashlib to preserve backwards
compatibility.
|