From 34bdeb5d81d2f772d7ed4bb263341331141d5f7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Heimes <christian@cheimes.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:24:18 +0100
Subject: Add a comment about *not* caching the hash value. Issue #9685
 suggested to memorize the hash value, but the feature request was rejected
 because no speed ups were found.

---
 Objects/tupleobject.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Objects/tupleobject.c b/Objects/tupleobject.c
index ec3f91b..0a95909 100644
--- a/Objects/tupleobject.c
+++ b/Objects/tupleobject.c
@@ -322,6 +322,9 @@ error:
 
      1082527, 1165049, 1082531, 1165057, 1247581, 1330103, 1082533,
      1330111, 1412633, 1165069, 1247599, 1495177, 1577699
+
+   Tests have shown that it's not worth to cache the hash value, see
+   issue #9685.
 */
 
 static Py_hash_t
-- 
cgit v0.12