From 3ba491e6b1747707374e56fd9f0fb958b2aafcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 23:33:34 +0000 Subject: The doctest was printing Sets, but that's unreliable because set elements get displayed in undefined dict order. Use a Set subclass instead (which arranges to sort the elements for display). --- Lib/test/test_sets.py | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_sets.py b/Lib/test/test_sets.py index fc431cb..9223596 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_sets.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_sets.py @@ -641,7 +641,10 @@ class TestCopyingNested(TestCopying): libreftest = """ Example from the Library Reference: Doc/lib/libsets.tex ->>> from sets import Set +>>> from sets import Set as Base # override _repr to get sorted output +>>> class Set(Base): +... def _repr(self): +... return Base._repr(self, sorted=True) >>> engineers = Set(['John', 'Jane', 'Jack', 'Janice']) >>> programmers = Set(['Jack', 'Sam', 'Susan', 'Janice']) >>> management = Set(['Jane', 'Jack', 'Susan', 'Zack']) @@ -650,7 +653,7 @@ Example from the Library Reference: Doc/lib/libsets.tex >>> fulltime_management = management - engineers - programmers # difference >>> engineers.add('Marvin') >>> print engineers -Set(['Jane', 'Marvin', 'Janice', 'John', 'Jack']) +Set(['Jack', 'Jane', 'Janice', 'John', 'Marvin']) >>> employees.issuperset(engineers) # superset test False >>> employees.update(engineers) # update from another set @@ -660,10 +663,10 @@ True ... group.discard('Susan') # unconditionally remove element ... print group ... -Set(['Jane', 'Marvin', 'Janice', 'John', 'Jack']) -Set(['Janice', 'Jack', 'Sam']) -Set(['Jane', 'Zack', 'Jack']) -Set(['Zack', 'Sam', 'Marvin', 'Jack', 'Jane', 'Janice', 'John']) +Set(['Jack', 'Jane', 'Janice', 'John', 'Marvin']) +Set(['Jack', 'Janice', 'Sam']) +Set(['Jack', 'Jane', 'Zack']) +Set(['Jack', 'Jane', 'Janice', 'John', 'Marvin', 'Sam', 'Zack']) """ #============================================================================== -- cgit v0.12