From fbd3b45bb7ddcd8c5d235e565990a59d8c0b9092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fred Drake Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:42:23 +0000 Subject: Stop lying about [].pop() being experimental! There is no backing it out at this point. --- Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex b/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex index 4f8020e..929f123 100644 --- a/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex +++ b/Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex @@ -506,10 +506,9 @@ Notes: \item[(3)] Raises \exception{ValueError} when \var{x} is not found in \var{s}. -\item[(4)] The \method{pop()} method is experimental and at the moment - only supported by the list and array types. The optional argument - \var{i} defaults to \code{-1}, so that by default the last item is - removed and returned. +\item[(4)] The \method{pop()} method only supported by the list and + array types. The optional argument \var{i} defaults to \code{-1}, + so that by default the last item is removed and returned. \item[(5)] The \method{sort()} and \method{reverse()} methods modify the list in place for economy of space when sorting or reversing a large -- cgit v0.12