From c15a82813acd556c93cdea6db3d40413e34e422a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:45:32 +0000 Subject: Change test_overflow to test_no_overflow; looks like big int literals are auto-coerced to longs now, but this test still expected OverflowError. I can't imagine this test failure was unique to Windows. --- Lib/test/test_unary.py | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_unary.py b/Lib/test/test_unary.py index 0419167..3402c55 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_unary.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_unary.py @@ -27,10 +27,11 @@ class UnaryOpTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assert_(--2 == 2) self.assert_(-2L == 0 - 2L) - def test_overflow(self): - self.assertRaises(OverflowError, eval, "+" + ("9" * 32)) - self.assertRaises(OverflowError, eval, "-" + ("9" * 32)) - self.assertRaises(OverflowError, eval, "~" + ("9" * 32)) + def test_no_overflow(self): + nines = "9" * 32 + self.assert_(eval("+" + nines) == eval("+" + nines + "L")) + self.assert_(eval("-" + nines) == eval("-" + nines + "L")) + self.assert_(eval("~" + nines) == eval("~" + nines + "L")) def test_bad_types(self): for op in '+', '-', '~': -- cgit v0.12