From 58eb0fcb8f33e8bfd1f850f42c9efb27e1b48417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Barry Warsaw Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 20:15:20 +0000 Subject: test_nested_inner_contains_outer_boundary(), test_nested_with_same_boundary(): Two evil samples from Anthony's MIME torture tests. --- Lib/email/test/test_email.py | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/Lib/email/test/test_email.py b/Lib/email/test/test_email.py index bd27960..59163f4 100644 --- a/Lib/email/test/test_email.py +++ b/Lib/email/test/test_email.py @@ -1325,6 +1325,42 @@ hello world msg = self._msgobj('msg_37.txt') self.assertEqual(len(msg.get_payload()), 3) + def test_nested_inner_contains_outer_boundary(self): + eq = self.ndiffAssertEqual + # msg_38.txt has an inner part that contains outer boundaries. My + # interpretation of RFC 2046 (based on sections 5.1 and 5.1.2) say + # these are illegal and should be interpreted as unterminated inner + # parts. + msg = self._msgobj('msg_38.txt') + sfp = StringIO() + Iterators._structure(msg, sfp) + eq(sfp.getvalue(), """\ +multipart/mixed + multipart/mixed + multipart/alternative + text/plain + text/plain + text/plain + text/plain +""") + + def test_nested_with_same_boundary(self): + eq = self.ndiffAssertEqual + # msg 39.txt is similarly evil in that it's got inner parts that use + # the same boundary as outer parts. Again, I believe the way this is + # parsed is closest to the spirit of RFC 2046 + msg = self._msgobj('msg_39.txt') + sfp = StringIO() + Iterators._structure(msg, sfp) + eq(sfp.getvalue(), """\ +multipart/mixed + multipart/mixed + multipart/alternative + application/octet-stream + application/octet-stream + text/plain +""") + # Test some badly formatted messages -- cgit v0.12