From 970188c2d792133e2273924a987e0542659a676f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Miss Islington (bot)" <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:00:32 -0800 Subject: bpo-39348: Fix code highlight for the SOCK_NONBLOCK example (GH-18018) The previous double colon was wrongly place directly after Therefore. Which produced a block without syntax highlighting. This fixes it by separating the double colon from the text. As a result, sphinx now properly highlights the python code. https://bugs.python.org/issue39348 (cherry picked from commit fad8b5674c66d9e00bb788e30adddb0c256c787b) Co-authored-by: Oz N Tiram --- Doc/library/socket.rst | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/library/socket.rst b/Doc/library/socket.rst index 178d7da..7e8075e 100644 --- a/Doc/library/socket.rst +++ b/Doc/library/socket.rst @@ -529,7 +529,9 @@ The following functions all create :ref:`socket objects `. When :const:`SOCK_NONBLOCK` or :const:`SOCK_CLOEXEC` bit flags are applied to *type* they are cleared, and :attr:`socket.type` will not reflect them. They are still passed - to the underlying system `socket()` call. Therefore:: + to the underlying system `socket()` call. Therefore, + + :: sock = socket.socket( socket.AF_INET, -- cgit v0.12