From 69a733bda34d413d3ad545ef3132240e5d2a7c0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre Delfino Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:12:15 -0300 Subject: [doc] Be more clear on super() regarding multiple base classes methods (GH-21789) --- Doc/library/functions.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/library/functions.rst b/Doc/library/functions.rst index 72441f0..7d8a669 100644 --- a/Doc/library/functions.rst +++ b/Doc/library/functions.rst @@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ are always available. They are listed here in alphabetical order. not found in statically compiled languages or languages that only support single inheritance. This makes it possible to implement "diamond diagrams" where multiple base classes implement the same method. Good design dictates - that this method have the same calling signature in every case (because the + that such implementations have the same calling signature in every case (because the order of calls is determined at runtime, because that order adapts to changes in the class hierarchy, and because that order can include sibling classes that are unknown prior to runtime). -- cgit v0.12