From 47c60ec9a0dfabcccdfdeee9d3077f08423505bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Skip Montanaro Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 06:08:35 +0000 Subject: Describe a bit about writing test cases for Python... --- Lib/test/README | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Lib/test/README diff --git a/Lib/test/README b/Lib/test/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2cf7736 --- /dev/null +++ b/Lib/test/README @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + Writing Python Test Cases + ------------------------- + Skip Montanaro + +If you add a new module to Python or modify the functionality of an existing +module, it is your responsibility to write one or more test cases to test +that new functionality. The mechanics of the test system are fairly +straightforward. If you are writing test cases for module zyzzyx, you need +to create a file in .../Lib/test named test_zyzzyx.py and an expected output +file in .../Lib/test/output named test_zyzzyx ("..." represents the +top-level directory in the Python source tree, the directory containing the +configure script). Generate the initial version of the test output file by +executing: + + cd .../Lib/test + python regrtest.py -g test_zyzzyx.py + +Any time you modify test_zyzzyx.py you need to generate a new expected +output file. Don't forget to desk check the generated output to make sure +it's really what you expected to find! To run a single test after modifying +a module, simply run regrtest.py without the -g flag: + + cd .../Lib/test + python regrtest.py test_zyzzyx.py + +To run the entire test suite, make the "test" target at the top level: + + cd ... + make test + +Test cases generate output based upon computed values and branches taken in +the code. When executed, regrtest.py compares the actual output generated +by executing the test case with the expected output and reports success or +failure. It stands to reason that if the actual and expected outputs are to +match, they must not contain any machine dependencies. This means +your test cases should not print out absolute machine addresses or floating +point numbers with large numbers of significant digits. + +Writing good test cases is a skilled task and is too complex to discuss in +detail in this short document. Many books have been written on the subject. +I'll show my age by suggesting that Glenford Myers' "The Art of Software +Testing", published in 1979, is still the best introduction to the subject +available. It is short (177 pages), easy to read, and discusses the major +elements of software testing, though its publication predates the +object-oriented software revolution, so doesn't cover that subject at all. +Unfortunately, it is very expensive (about $100 new). If you can borrow it +or find it used (around $20), I strongly urge you to pick up a copy. + +As an author of at least part of a module, you will be writing unit tests +(isolated tests of functions and objects defined by the module) using white +box techniques. (Unlike black box testing, where you only have the external +interfaces to guide your test case writing, in white box testing you can see +the code being tested and tailor your test cases to exercise it more +completely). + +The most important goal when writing test cases is to break things. A test +case that doesn't uncover a bug is less valuable than one that does. In +designing test cases you should pay attention to the following: + + 1. Your test cases should exercise all the functions and objects defined + in the module, not just the ones meant to be called by users of your + module. This may require you to write test code that uses the module + in ways you don't expect (explicitly calling internal functions, for + example - see test_atexit.py). + + 2. You should consider any boundary values that may tickle exceptional + conditions (e.g. if you were testing a division module you might well + want to generate tests with numerators and denominators at the limits + of floating point and integer numbers on the machine performing the + tests as well as a denominator of zero). + + 3. You should exercise as many paths through the code as possible. This + may not always be possible, but is a goal to strive for. In + particular, when considering if statements (or their equivalent), you + want to create test cases that exercise both the true and false + branches. For while and for statements, you should create test cases + that exercise the loop zero, one and multiple times. -- cgit v0.12