From 0555cde98d37d3012fbed20a91f6afdacbf79523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Larry Hastings Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:17:23 -0800 Subject: Issue #13086: Update howto/cporting.rst to discuss "Python 3" instead of "3.0". --- Doc/howto/cporting.rst | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/howto/cporting.rst b/Doc/howto/cporting.rst index 7ef7537..98db9dd 100644 --- a/Doc/howto/cporting.rst +++ b/Doc/howto/cporting.rst @@ -2,27 +2,28 @@ .. _cporting-howto: -******************************** -Porting Extension Modules to 3.0 -******************************** +************************************* +Porting Extension Modules to Python 3 +************************************* :author: Benjamin Peterson .. topic:: Abstract - Although changing the C-API was not one of Python 3.0's objectives, the many - Python level changes made leaving 2.x's API intact impossible. In fact, some - changes such as :func:`int` and :func:`long` unification are more obvious on - the C level. This document endeavors to document incompatibilities and how - they can be worked around. + Although changing the C-API was not one of Python 3's objectives, + the many Python-level changes made leaving Python 2's API intact + impossible. In fact, some changes such as :func:`int` and + :func:`long` unification are more obvious on the C level. This + document endeavors to document incompatibilities and how they can + be worked around. Conditional compilation ======================= -The easiest way to compile only some code for 3.0 is to check if -:c:macro:`PY_MAJOR_VERSION` is greater than or equal to 3. :: +The easiest way to compile only some code for Python 3 is to check +if :c:macro:`PY_MAJOR_VERSION` is greater than or equal to 3. :: #if PY_MAJOR_VERSION >= 3 #define IS_PY3K @@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ conditional blocks. Changes to Object APIs ====================== -Python 3.0 merged together some types with similar functions while cleanly +Python 3 merged together some types with similar functions while cleanly separating others. @@ -43,14 +44,14 @@ str/unicode Unification ----------------------- -Python 3.0's :func:`str` (``PyString_*`` functions in C) type is equivalent to -2.x's :func:`unicode` (``PyUnicode_*``). The old 8-bit string type has become -:func:`bytes`. Python 2.6 and later provide a compatibility header, +Python 3's :func:`str` (``PyString_*`` functions in C) type is equivalent to +Python 2's :func:`unicode` (``PyUnicode_*``). The old 8-bit string type has +become :func:`bytes`. Python 2.6 and later provide a compatibility header, :file:`bytesobject.h`, mapping ``PyBytes`` names to ``PyString`` ones. For best -compatibility with 3.0, :c:type:`PyUnicode` should be used for textual data and +compatibility with Python 3, :c:type:`PyUnicode` should be used for textual data and :c:type:`PyBytes` for binary data. It's also important to remember that -:c:type:`PyBytes` and :c:type:`PyUnicode` in 3.0 are not interchangeable like -:c:type:`PyString` and :c:type:`PyUnicode` are in 2.x. The following example +:c:type:`PyBytes` and :c:type:`PyUnicode` in Python 3 are not interchangeable like +:c:type:`PyString` and :c:type:`PyUnicode` are in Python 2. The following example shows best practices with regards to :c:type:`PyUnicode`, :c:type:`PyString`, and :c:type:`PyBytes`. :: @@ -94,10 +95,12 @@ and :c:type:`PyBytes`. :: long/int Unification -------------------- -In Python 3.0, there is only one integer type. It is called :func:`int` on the -Python level, but actually corresponds to 2.x's :func:`long` type. In the -C-API, ``PyInt_*`` functions are replaced by their ``PyLong_*`` neighbors. The -best course of action here is using the ``PyInt_*`` functions aliased to +Python 3 has only one integer type, :func:`int`. But it actually +corresponds to Python 2's :func:`long` type--the :func:`int` type +used in Python 2 was removed. In the C-API, ``PyInt_*`` functions +are replaced by their ``PyLong_*`` equivalents. + +The best course of action here is using the ``PyInt_*`` functions aliased to ``PyLong_*`` found in :file:`intobject.h`. The abstract ``PyNumber_*`` APIs can also be used in some cases. :: @@ -120,10 +123,11 @@ can also be used in some cases. :: Module initialization and state =============================== -Python 3.0 has a revamped extension module initialization system. (See -:pep:`3121`.) Instead of storing module state in globals, they should be stored -in an interpreter specific structure. Creating modules that act correctly in -both 2.x and 3.0 is tricky. The following simple example demonstrates how. :: +Python 3 has a revamped extension module initialization system. (See +:pep:`3121`.) Instead of storing module state in globals, they should +be stored in an interpreter specific structure. Creating modules that +act correctly in both Python 2 and Python 3 is tricky. The following +simple example demonstrates how. :: #include "Python.h" @@ -223,15 +227,18 @@ If you're currently using CObjects, and you want to migrate to 3.1 or newer, you'll need to switch to Capsules. :c:type:`CObject` was deprecated in 3.1 and 2.7 and completely removed in Python 3.2. If you only support 2.7, or 3.1 and above, you -can simply switch to :c:type:`Capsule`. If you need to support 3.0 or -versions of Python earlier than 2.7 you'll have to support both CObjects -and Capsules. +can simply switch to :c:type:`Capsule`. If you need to support Python 3.0, +or versions of Python earlier than 2.7, +you'll have to support both CObjects and Capsules. +(Note that Python 3.0 is no longer supported, and it is not recommended +for production use.) The following example header file :file:`capsulethunk.h` may -solve the problem for you; -simply write your code against the :c:type:`Capsule` API, include -this header file after ``"Python.h"``, and you'll automatically use CObjects -in Python 3.0 or versions earlier than 2.7. +solve the problem for you. Simply write your code against the +:c:type:`Capsule` API and include this header file after +:file:`Python.h`. Your code will automatically use Capsules +in versions of Python with Capsules, and switch to CObjects +when Capsules are unavailable. :file:`capsulethunk.h` simulates Capsules using CObjects. However, :c:type:`CObject` provides no place to store the capsule's "name". As a @@ -266,5 +273,5 @@ Other options If you are writing a new extension module, you might consider `Cython `_. It translates a Python-like language to C. The -extension modules it creates are compatible with Python 3.x and 2.x. +extension modules it creates are compatible with Python 3 and Python 2. -- cgit v0.12