From fd35be511a5845e887408189a06513063319f417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Miss Islington (bot)" <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:00:34 -0700 Subject: Doc: No need to use rst syntax in code comments. (GH-93102) And it raises `make suspicious` false positives. (cherry picked from commit e739ff141680fd7e2a762cf98c4352c6c850af1f) Co-authored-by: Julien Palard --- Doc/whatsnew/3.11.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/whatsnew/3.11.rst b/Doc/whatsnew/3.11.rst index ff94e45..12b4c22 100644 --- a/Doc/whatsnew/3.11.rst +++ b/Doc/whatsnew/3.11.rst @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ transforms a class, giving it :func:`dataclasses.dataclass`-like behaviors. For example:: - # The ``create_model`` decorator is defined by a library. + # The create_model decorator is defined by a library. @typing.dataclass_transform() def create_model(cls: Type[T]) -> Type[T]: cls.__init__ = ... @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ For example:: cls.__ne__ = ... return cls - # The ``create_model`` decorator can now be used to create new model + # The create_model decorator can now be used to create new model # classes, like this: @create_model class CustomerModel: -- cgit v0.12