From d11b5e54f0e9ac51fbb49ebe5f1fc0626d59fc55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@pythonware.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:22:26 +0000
Subject: Recompile pattern if (?x) flag was found inside the pattern during
 the first scan.  Closes bug #115040.

---
 Lib/sre_parse.py     | 5 +++++
 Lib/test/re_tests.py | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Lib/sre_parse.py b/Lib/sre_parse.py
index f4741c9..fcf5bcc 100644
--- a/Lib/sre_parse.py
+++ b/Lib/sre_parse.py
@@ -593,6 +593,11 @@ def parse(str, flags=0, pattern=None):
 
     # p.dump()
 
+    if not (flags & SRE_FLAG_VERBOSE) and p.pattern.flags & SRE_FLAG_VERBOSE:
+        # the VERBOSE flag was switched on inside the pattern.  to be
+        # on the safe side, we'll parse the whole thing again...
+        return parse(str, p.pattern.flags)
+
     return p
 
 def parse_template(source, pattern):
diff --git a/Lib/test/re_tests.py b/Lib/test/re_tests.py
index bb72f3d..8675224 100755
--- a/Lib/test/re_tests.py
+++ b/Lib/test/re_tests.py
@@ -612,9 +612,11 @@ xyzabc
     (r'(([a-z]+):)?([a-z]+)$', 'smil', SUCCEED, 'g1+"-"+g2+"-"+g3', 'None-None-smil'),
     # bug 111869 (PRE/PCRE fails on this one, SRE doesn't)
     (r'.*d', 'abc\nabd', SUCCEED, 'found', 'abd'),
-    # bug 112468
+    # bug 112468: various expected syntax errors
     ('(', '', SYNTAX_ERROR),
     ('[\\41]', '!', SUCCEED, 'found', '!'),
-    # bug 115618
+    # bug 115040: rescan if flags are modified inside pattern
+    (r' (?x)foo ', 'foo', SUCCEED, 'found', 'foo'),
+    # bug 115618: negative lookahead
     (r'(?<!abc)(d.f)', 'abcdefdof', SUCCEED, 'found', 'dof'),
 ]
-- 
cgit v0.12